Studying transitions: past, present, and future

Mohammadreza Zolfagharian, Bob Walrave, Rob Raven, A. Georges L. Romme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The domain of transition studies has been drawing more and more scholarly attention and, as a result, its body of knowledge is rapidly growing. This raises new challenges as well as opportunities, not the least regarding the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of research in this domain. In this respect, transition research, as a relatively young field of inquiry, has been little concerned with methodological investigation and reflection. We propose a framework that enables this reflection: the so-called ‘transition research onion’. Subsequently, we utilize this framework to systematically assess 217 peer-reviewed papers in the field of transition studies, to distill key methodological patterns and trends of the field. The findings suggest that the methodology of transition studies, in terms of depth and diversity, is underdeveloped. These insights serve to guide future research on transition processes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103788
Number of pages16
JournalResearch Policy
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Innovation studies
  • Research methods
  • Systematic review
  • Transition studies
  • Transitions

Cite this