Studying transitions

past, present, and future

Mohammadreza Zolfagharian, Bob Walrave, Rob Raven, A. Georges L. Romme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The domain of transition studies has been drawing more and more scholarly attention and, as a result, its body of knowledge is rapidly growing. This raises new challenges as well as opportunities, not the least regarding the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of research in this domain. In this respect, transition research, as a relatively young field of inquiry, has been little concerned with methodological investigation and reflection. We propose a framework that enables this reflection: the so-called ‘transition research onion’. Subsequently, we utilize this framework to systematically assess 217 peer-reviewed papers in the field of transition studies, to distill key methodological patterns and trends of the field. The findings suggest that the methodology of transition studies, in terms of depth and diversity, is underdeveloped. These insights serve to guide future research on transition processes.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalResearch Policy
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 May 2019

Keywords

  • Innovation studies
  • Research methods
  • Systematic review
  • Transition studies
  • Transitions

Cite this

Zolfagharian, Mohammadreza ; Walrave, Bob ; Raven, Rob ; Romme, A. Georges L. / Studying transitions : past, present, and future. In: Research Policy. 2019.
@article{5e59fd2504644b1ca1438fb83cd5d5df,
title = "Studying transitions: past, present, and future",
abstract = "The domain of transition studies has been drawing more and more scholarly attention and, as a result, its body of knowledge is rapidly growing. This raises new challenges as well as opportunities, not the least regarding the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of research in this domain. In this respect, transition research, as a relatively young field of inquiry, has been little concerned with methodological investigation and reflection. We propose a framework that enables this reflection: the so-called ‘transition research onion’. Subsequently, we utilize this framework to systematically assess 217 peer-reviewed papers in the field of transition studies, to distill key methodological patterns and trends of the field. The findings suggest that the methodology of transition studies, in terms of depth and diversity, is underdeveloped. These insights serve to guide future research on transition processes.",
keywords = "Innovation studies, Research methods, Systematic review, Transition studies, Transitions",
author = "Mohammadreza Zolfagharian and Bob Walrave and Rob Raven and Romme, {A. Georges L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012",
language = "English",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Studying transitions : past, present, and future. / Zolfagharian, Mohammadreza; Walrave, Bob; Raven, Rob; Romme, A. Georges L.

In: Research Policy, 21.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studying transitions

T2 - past, present, and future

AU - Zolfagharian, Mohammadreza

AU - Walrave, Bob

AU - Raven, Rob

AU - Romme, A. Georges L.

PY - 2019/5/21

Y1 - 2019/5/21

N2 - The domain of transition studies has been drawing more and more scholarly attention and, as a result, its body of knowledge is rapidly growing. This raises new challenges as well as opportunities, not the least regarding the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of research in this domain. In this respect, transition research, as a relatively young field of inquiry, has been little concerned with methodological investigation and reflection. We propose a framework that enables this reflection: the so-called ‘transition research onion’. Subsequently, we utilize this framework to systematically assess 217 peer-reviewed papers in the field of transition studies, to distill key methodological patterns and trends of the field. The findings suggest that the methodology of transition studies, in terms of depth and diversity, is underdeveloped. These insights serve to guide future research on transition processes.

AB - The domain of transition studies has been drawing more and more scholarly attention and, as a result, its body of knowledge is rapidly growing. This raises new challenges as well as opportunities, not the least regarding the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of research in this domain. In this respect, transition research, as a relatively young field of inquiry, has been little concerned with methodological investigation and reflection. We propose a framework that enables this reflection: the so-called ‘transition research onion’. Subsequently, we utilize this framework to systematically assess 217 peer-reviewed papers in the field of transition studies, to distill key methodological patterns and trends of the field. The findings suggest that the methodology of transition studies, in terms of depth and diversity, is underdeveloped. These insights serve to guide future research on transition processes.

KW - Innovation studies

KW - Research methods

KW - Systematic review

KW - Transition studies

KW - Transitions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065704433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012

M3 - Article

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

ER -