Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

Simon G.A. Brown, Emma L. Ball, Kyle Perrin, Catherine A. Read, Stephen E. Asha, Richard Beasley, Diana Egerton-Warburton, Peter G. Jones, Gerben Keijzers, Frances B. Kinnear, Ben C.H. Kwan, Y. C.Gary Lee, Julian A. Smith, Quentin A. Summers, Graham Simpson, PSP Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95% power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9%, assuming 99% successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011826
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Cite this

Brown, S. G. A., Ball, E. L., Perrin, K., Read, C. A., Asha, S. E., Beasley, R., ... PSP Study Group (2016). Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. BMJ Open, 6(9), [e011826]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826
Brown, Simon G.A. ; Ball, Emma L. ; Perrin, Kyle ; Read, Catherine A. ; Asha, Stephen E. ; Beasley, Richard ; Egerton-Warburton, Diana ; Jones, Peter G. ; Keijzers, Gerben ; Kinnear, Frances B. ; Kwan, Ben C.H. ; Lee, Y. C.Gary ; Smith, Julian A. ; Summers, Quentin A. ; Simpson, Graham ; PSP Study Group. / Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. In: BMJ Open. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 9.
@article{78807e02da174ce2a2b19190c586ad8d,
title = "Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95{\%} power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9{\%}, assuming 99{\%} successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results.",
keywords = "ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE",
author = "Brown, {Simon G.A.} and Ball, {Emma L.} and Kyle Perrin and Read, {Catherine A.} and Asha, {Stephen E.} and Richard Beasley and Diana Egerton-Warburton and Jones, {Peter G.} and Gerben Keijzers and Kinnear, {Frances B.} and Kwan, {Ben C.H.} and Lee, {Y. C.Gary} and Smith, {Julian A.} and Summers, {Quentin A.} and Graham Simpson and {PSP Study Group}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

Brown, SGA, Ball, EL, Perrin, K, Read, CA, Asha, SE, Beasley, R, Egerton-Warburton, D, Jones, PG, Keijzers, G, Kinnear, FB, Kwan, BCH, Lee, YCG, Smith, JA, Summers, QA, Simpson, G & PSP Study Group 2016, 'Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax', BMJ Open, vol. 6, no. 9, e011826. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. / Brown, Simon G.A.; Ball, Emma L.; Perrin, Kyle; Read, Catherine A.; Asha, Stephen E.; Beasley, Richard; Egerton-Warburton, Diana; Jones, Peter G.; Keijzers, Gerben; Kinnear, Frances B.; Kwan, Ben C.H.; Lee, Y. C.Gary; Smith, Julian A.; Summers, Quentin A.; Simpson, Graham; PSP Study Group.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 9, e011826, 13.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

AU - Brown, Simon G.A.

AU - Ball, Emma L.

AU - Perrin, Kyle

AU - Read, Catherine A.

AU - Asha, Stephen E.

AU - Beasley, Richard

AU - Egerton-Warburton, Diana

AU - Jones, Peter G.

AU - Keijzers, Gerben

AU - Kinnear, Frances B.

AU - Kwan, Ben C.H.

AU - Lee, Y. C.Gary

AU - Smith, Julian A.

AU - Summers, Quentin A.

AU - Simpson, Graham

AU - PSP Study Group

PY - 2016/9/13

Y1 - 2016/9/13

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95% power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9%, assuming 99% successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Current management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is variable, with little evidence from randomised controlled trials to guide treatment. Guidelines emphasise intervention in many patients, which involves chest drain insertion, hospital admission and occasionally surgery. However, there is evidence that conservative management may be effective and safe, and it may also reduce the risk of recurrence. Significant questions remain regarding the optimal initial approach to the management of PSP.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, parallel group, non-inferiority study will randomise 342 participants with a first large PSP to conservative or interventional management. To maintain allocation concealment, randomisation will be performed in real time by computer and stratified by study site. Conservative management will involve a period of observation prior to discharge, with intervention for worsening symptoms or physiological instability. Interventional treatment will involve insertion of a small bore drain. If drainage continues after 1 hour, the patient will be admitted. If drainage stops, the drain will be clamped for 4 hours. The patient will be discharged if the lung remains inflated. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted. The primary end point is the proportion of participants with complete lung re-expansion by 8 weeks. Secondary end points are as follows: days in hospital, persistent air leak, predefined complications and adverse events, time to resolution of symptoms, and pneumothorax recurrence during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. The study has 95% power to detect an absolute non-inferiority margin of 9%, assuming 99% successful expansion at 8 weeks in the invasive treatment arm. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethics approval has been obtained for all sites. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal and presentation at major international Emergency Medicine and Respiratory meetings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000184976; Pre-results.

KW - ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031834777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e011826

ER -