Student and teacher perceptions of the degree of difficulty in a mathematics course

C. C. Scott, P. J. Fensham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In designing a curriculum and its constituent teaching and learning strategies, it is important to consider the relative difficulties of the various sub-sections. As single measures of perceived difficulty (from teachers and learners) have been used in some studies, the efficacy of such readily available data has been studied in a tertiary level mathematics course for engineering students. Several approaches (parallel forms, comparison with achievement, and loaded questions) to the reliability and the validity of the measures of perceived difficulty are explored. The results indicate that the findings from such measures need to be interpreted with caution. This was particularly so during the first year of the course when the students have so recently come from a great variety of other mathematics learning environments in secondary schooling. The efficacy of the measures seems to be much improved in the second year of the course and the quite high correlation (0-753) between staff and student perceptions of topic difficulty probably does indicate a real congruence of ' mathematical socialization ' between both sets of participants in this mathematics curriculum.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-384
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1977

Cite this

@article{937260f39ebc4927a80648610c02f155,
title = "Student and teacher perceptions of the degree of difficulty in a mathematics course",
abstract = "In designing a curriculum and its constituent teaching and learning strategies, it is important to consider the relative difficulties of the various sub-sections. As single measures of perceived difficulty (from teachers and learners) have been used in some studies, the efficacy of such readily available data has been studied in a tertiary level mathematics course for engineering students. Several approaches (parallel forms, comparison with achievement, and loaded questions) to the reliability and the validity of the measures of perceived difficulty are explored. The results indicate that the findings from such measures need to be interpreted with caution. This was particularly so during the first year of the course when the students have so recently come from a great variety of other mathematics learning environments in secondary schooling. The efficacy of the measures seems to be much improved in the second year of the course and the quite high correlation (0-753) between staff and student perceptions of topic difficulty probably does indicate a real congruence of ' mathematical socialization ' between both sets of participants in this mathematics curriculum.",
author = "Scott, {C. C.} and Fensham, {P. J.}",
year = "1977",
doi = "10.1080/0020739770080401",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "375--384",
journal = "International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology",
issn = "0020-739X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Student and teacher perceptions of the degree of difficulty in a mathematics course. / Scott, C. C.; Fensham, P. J.

In: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1977, p. 375-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student and teacher perceptions of the degree of difficulty in a mathematics course

AU - Scott, C. C.

AU - Fensham, P. J.

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - In designing a curriculum and its constituent teaching and learning strategies, it is important to consider the relative difficulties of the various sub-sections. As single measures of perceived difficulty (from teachers and learners) have been used in some studies, the efficacy of such readily available data has been studied in a tertiary level mathematics course for engineering students. Several approaches (parallel forms, comparison with achievement, and loaded questions) to the reliability and the validity of the measures of perceived difficulty are explored. The results indicate that the findings from such measures need to be interpreted with caution. This was particularly so during the first year of the course when the students have so recently come from a great variety of other mathematics learning environments in secondary schooling. The efficacy of the measures seems to be much improved in the second year of the course and the quite high correlation (0-753) between staff and student perceptions of topic difficulty probably does indicate a real congruence of ' mathematical socialization ' between both sets of participants in this mathematics curriculum.

AB - In designing a curriculum and its constituent teaching and learning strategies, it is important to consider the relative difficulties of the various sub-sections. As single measures of perceived difficulty (from teachers and learners) have been used in some studies, the efficacy of such readily available data has been studied in a tertiary level mathematics course for engineering students. Several approaches (parallel forms, comparison with achievement, and loaded questions) to the reliability and the validity of the measures of perceived difficulty are explored. The results indicate that the findings from such measures need to be interpreted with caution. This was particularly so during the first year of the course when the students have so recently come from a great variety of other mathematics learning environments in secondary schooling. The efficacy of the measures seems to be much improved in the second year of the course and the quite high correlation (0-753) between staff and student perceptions of topic difficulty probably does indicate a real congruence of ' mathematical socialization ' between both sets of participants in this mathematics curriculum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946360325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0020739770080401

DO - 10.1080/0020739770080401

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 375

EP - 384

JO - International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

JF - International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

SN - 0020-739X

IS - 4

ER -