Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review

Renata Morello, Judy Lowthian, Anna Barker, Rosemary Anna McGinnes, David Dunt, Caroline Anne Brand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies to improve hospital patient safety climate. Data sources: Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, proQuest and psychinfo databases, with manual searches of quality and safety websites, bibliographies of included articles and key journals. Study selection: English language studies published between January 1996 and April 2011 that measured the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies using a quantitative measure of patient safety climate in a hospital setting. Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series and historically controlled studies. Data extraction: Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Study design, intervention, level of application, setting, study participants, safety climate outcome measures and implementation lessons were extracted from each article. Results of data synthesis: Over 2000 articles were screened, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, one cluster RCT, seven controlled before and after studies, and 13 historically controlled studies. There was marked methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. Impacts of 11 different strategies were reported. There was some evidence to support that leadership walk rounds (p=0.02) and multifaceted unit-based programmes (p <0.05) may have a positive impact on patient safety climate. Conclusions: Despite strong face validity for a variety of patient safety culture strategies, there is limited evidence to support definitive impacts on patient safety climate outcomes. Organisations are advised to consider robust evaluation designs when implementing these potentially resource intensive strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11 - 18
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Quality & Safety
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{06aa654f1522479ea3a66aa8ecde991b,
title = "Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review",
abstract = "To determine the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies to improve hospital patient safety climate. Data sources: Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, proQuest and psychinfo databases, with manual searches of quality and safety websites, bibliographies of included articles and key journals. Study selection: English language studies published between January 1996 and April 2011 that measured the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies using a quantitative measure of patient safety climate in a hospital setting. Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series and historically controlled studies. Data extraction: Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Study design, intervention, level of application, setting, study participants, safety climate outcome measures and implementation lessons were extracted from each article. Results of data synthesis: Over 2000 articles were screened, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, one cluster RCT, seven controlled before and after studies, and 13 historically controlled studies. There was marked methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. Impacts of 11 different strategies were reported. There was some evidence to support that leadership walk rounds (p=0.02) and multifaceted unit-based programmes (p <0.05) may have a positive impact on patient safety climate. Conclusions: Despite strong face validity for a variety of patient safety culture strategies, there is limited evidence to support definitive impacts on patient safety climate outcomes. Organisations are advised to consider robust evaluation designs when implementing these potentially resource intensive strategies.",
author = "Renata Morello and Judy Lowthian and Anna Barker and McGinnes, {Rosemary Anna} and David Dunt and Brand, {Caroline Anne}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "11 -- 18",
journal = "BMJ Quality & Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. / Morello, Renata; Lowthian, Judy; Barker, Anna; McGinnes, Rosemary Anna; Dunt, David; Brand, Caroline Anne.

In: BMJ Quality & Safety, Vol. 22, 2013, p. 11 - 18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review

AU - Morello, Renata

AU - Lowthian, Judy

AU - Barker, Anna

AU - McGinnes, Rosemary Anna

AU - Dunt, David

AU - Brand, Caroline Anne

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - To determine the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies to improve hospital patient safety climate. Data sources: Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, proQuest and psychinfo databases, with manual searches of quality and safety websites, bibliographies of included articles and key journals. Study selection: English language studies published between January 1996 and April 2011 that measured the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies using a quantitative measure of patient safety climate in a hospital setting. Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series and historically controlled studies. Data extraction: Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Study design, intervention, level of application, setting, study participants, safety climate outcome measures and implementation lessons were extracted from each article. Results of data synthesis: Over 2000 articles were screened, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, one cluster RCT, seven controlled before and after studies, and 13 historically controlled studies. There was marked methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. Impacts of 11 different strategies were reported. There was some evidence to support that leadership walk rounds (p=0.02) and multifaceted unit-based programmes (p <0.05) may have a positive impact on patient safety climate. Conclusions: Despite strong face validity for a variety of patient safety culture strategies, there is limited evidence to support definitive impacts on patient safety climate outcomes. Organisations are advised to consider robust evaluation designs when implementing these potentially resource intensive strategies.

AB - To determine the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies to improve hospital patient safety climate. Data sources: Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, proQuest and psychinfo databases, with manual searches of quality and safety websites, bibliographies of included articles and key journals. Study selection: English language studies published between January 1996 and April 2011 that measured the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies using a quantitative measure of patient safety climate in a hospital setting. Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series and historically controlled studies. Data extraction: Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Study design, intervention, level of application, setting, study participants, safety climate outcome measures and implementation lessons were extracted from each article. Results of data synthesis: Over 2000 articles were screened, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, one cluster RCT, seven controlled before and after studies, and 13 historically controlled studies. There was marked methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. Impacts of 11 different strategies were reported. There was some evidence to support that leadership walk rounds (p=0.02) and multifaceted unit-based programmes (p <0.05) may have a positive impact on patient safety climate. Conclusions: Despite strong face validity for a variety of patient safety culture strategies, there is limited evidence to support definitive impacts on patient safety climate outcomes. Organisations are advised to consider robust evaluation designs when implementing these potentially resource intensive strategies.

UR - http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/22/1/11.full.pdf+html

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - BMJ Quality & Safety

JF - BMJ Quality & Safety

SN - 2044-5415

ER -