Statistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water

Significant findings based on several leaching methods

Ke Yin, Xiaomin Dou, Fei Ren, Wei-Ping Chan, Victor Wei-Chung Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bottom ashes generated from municipal solid waste incineration have gained increasing popularity as alternative construction materials, however, they contains elevated heavy metals posing a challenge for its free usage. Different leaching methods are developed to quantify leaching potential of incineration bottom ashes meanwhile guide its environmentally friendly application. Yet, there are diverse IBA applications while the in situ environment is always complicated, challenging its legislation. In this study, leaching tests were conveyed using batch and column leaching methods with seawater as opposed to deionized water, to unveil the metal leaching potential of IBA subjected to salty environment, which is commonly encountered when using IBA in land reclamation yet not well understood. Statistical analysis for different leaching methods suggested disparate performance between seawater and deionized water primarily ascribed to ionic strength. Impacts of leachant are metal-specific dependent on leaching methods and have a function of intrinsic characteristics of incineration bottom ashes. Leaching performances were further compared on additional perspectives, e.g. leaching approach and liquid to solid ratio, indicating sophisticated leaching potentials dominated by combined geochemistry. It is necessary to develop application-oriented leaching methods with corresponding leaching criteria to preclude discriminations between different applications, e.g., terrestrial applications vs. land reclamation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-648
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume344
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Incineration bottom ashes
  • Leaching methods
  • Metal leaching
  • Seawater
  • Utilization

Cite this

@article{c783cef916684637bc0f09c1291b8b3f,
title = "Statistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water: Significant findings based on several leaching methods",
abstract = "Bottom ashes generated from municipal solid waste incineration have gained increasing popularity as alternative construction materials, however, they contains elevated heavy metals posing a challenge for its free usage. Different leaching methods are developed to quantify leaching potential of incineration bottom ashes meanwhile guide its environmentally friendly application. Yet, there are diverse IBA applications while the in situ environment is always complicated, challenging its legislation. In this study, leaching tests were conveyed using batch and column leaching methods with seawater as opposed to deionized water, to unveil the metal leaching potential of IBA subjected to salty environment, which is commonly encountered when using IBA in land reclamation yet not well understood. Statistical analysis for different leaching methods suggested disparate performance between seawater and deionized water primarily ascribed to ionic strength. Impacts of leachant are metal-specific dependent on leaching methods and have a function of intrinsic characteristics of incineration bottom ashes. Leaching performances were further compared on additional perspectives, e.g. leaching approach and liquid to solid ratio, indicating sophisticated leaching potentials dominated by combined geochemistry. It is necessary to develop application-oriented leaching methods with corresponding leaching criteria to preclude discriminations between different applications, e.g., terrestrial applications vs. land reclamation.",
keywords = "Incineration bottom ashes, Leaching methods, Metal leaching, Seawater, Utilization",
author = "Ke Yin and Xiaomin Dou and Fei Ren and Wei-Ping Chan and Chang, {Victor Wei-Chung}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "344",
pages = "635--648",
journal = "Journal of Hazardous Materials",
issn = "0304-3894",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Statistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water : Significant findings based on several leaching methods. / Yin, Ke; Dou, Xiaomin; Ren, Fei; Chan, Wei-Ping; Chang, Victor Wei-Chung.

In: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 344, 15.02.2018, p. 635-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water

T2 - Significant findings based on several leaching methods

AU - Yin, Ke

AU - Dou, Xiaomin

AU - Ren, Fei

AU - Chan, Wei-Ping

AU - Chang, Victor Wei-Chung

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - Bottom ashes generated from municipal solid waste incineration have gained increasing popularity as alternative construction materials, however, they contains elevated heavy metals posing a challenge for its free usage. Different leaching methods are developed to quantify leaching potential of incineration bottom ashes meanwhile guide its environmentally friendly application. Yet, there are diverse IBA applications while the in situ environment is always complicated, challenging its legislation. In this study, leaching tests were conveyed using batch and column leaching methods with seawater as opposed to deionized water, to unveil the metal leaching potential of IBA subjected to salty environment, which is commonly encountered when using IBA in land reclamation yet not well understood. Statistical analysis for different leaching methods suggested disparate performance between seawater and deionized water primarily ascribed to ionic strength. Impacts of leachant are metal-specific dependent on leaching methods and have a function of intrinsic characteristics of incineration bottom ashes. Leaching performances were further compared on additional perspectives, e.g. leaching approach and liquid to solid ratio, indicating sophisticated leaching potentials dominated by combined geochemistry. It is necessary to develop application-oriented leaching methods with corresponding leaching criteria to preclude discriminations between different applications, e.g., terrestrial applications vs. land reclamation.

AB - Bottom ashes generated from municipal solid waste incineration have gained increasing popularity as alternative construction materials, however, they contains elevated heavy metals posing a challenge for its free usage. Different leaching methods are developed to quantify leaching potential of incineration bottom ashes meanwhile guide its environmentally friendly application. Yet, there are diverse IBA applications while the in situ environment is always complicated, challenging its legislation. In this study, leaching tests were conveyed using batch and column leaching methods with seawater as opposed to deionized water, to unveil the metal leaching potential of IBA subjected to salty environment, which is commonly encountered when using IBA in land reclamation yet not well understood. Statistical analysis for different leaching methods suggested disparate performance between seawater and deionized water primarily ascribed to ionic strength. Impacts of leachant are metal-specific dependent on leaching methods and have a function of intrinsic characteristics of incineration bottom ashes. Leaching performances were further compared on additional perspectives, e.g. leaching approach and liquid to solid ratio, indicating sophisticated leaching potentials dominated by combined geochemistry. It is necessary to develop application-oriented leaching methods with corresponding leaching criteria to preclude discriminations between different applications, e.g., terrestrial applications vs. land reclamation.

KW - Incineration bottom ashes

KW - Leaching methods

KW - Metal leaching

KW - Seawater

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032683229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.004

M3 - Article

VL - 344

SP - 635

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials

JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials

SN - 0304-3894

ER -