State-varying illiquidity risk in sovereign bond spreads

Paul Docherty, Steve Easton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Illiquidity and default risk are determinants of bond spreads that models suggest vary across market states. The Australian sovereign debt market, where the Australian government provided an explicit guarantee over semi-government debt, provides an environment in which to examine these separate factors. We find little evidence that the factors proposed by reduced-form models can explain sovereign spreads, while, consistent with flights to liquidity, illiquidity risk is relevant particularly important during periods of market stress. These flights to liquidity are substantially more prominent at the shorter end of the term structure, whereas volatility predominantly explains longer-maturity sovereign spreads. The term spread of sovereign yields is shown to be negatively related to illiquidity during periods of stress, indicating that theoretical models that incorporate flights to liquidity need to be expanded to include the impact of such flights on both the level and slope of yields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-248
Number of pages14
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Illiquidity risk
  • Sovereign debt
  • Volatility
  • Yield spreads

Cite this

@article{523c882443cc4de0be18303a55bdface,
title = "State-varying illiquidity risk in sovereign bond spreads",
abstract = "Illiquidity and default risk are determinants of bond spreads that models suggest vary across market states. The Australian sovereign debt market, where the Australian government provided an explicit guarantee over semi-government debt, provides an environment in which to examine these separate factors. We find little evidence that the factors proposed by reduced-form models can explain sovereign spreads, while, consistent with flights to liquidity, illiquidity risk is relevant particularly important during periods of market stress. These flights to liquidity are substantially more prominent at the shorter end of the term structure, whereas volatility predominantly explains longer-maturity sovereign spreads. The term spread of sovereign yields is shown to be negatively related to illiquidity during periods of stress, indicating that theoretical models that incorporate flights to liquidity need to be expanded to include the impact of such flights on both the level and slope of yields.",
keywords = "Illiquidity risk, Sovereign debt, Volatility, Yield spreads",
author = "Paul Docherty and Steve Easton",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "235--248",
journal = "Pacific Basin Finance Journal",
issn = "0927-538X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

State-varying illiquidity risk in sovereign bond spreads. / Docherty, Paul; Easton, Steve.

In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 50, 09.2018, p. 235-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - State-varying illiquidity risk in sovereign bond spreads

AU - Docherty, Paul

AU - Easton, Steve

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Illiquidity and default risk are determinants of bond spreads that models suggest vary across market states. The Australian sovereign debt market, where the Australian government provided an explicit guarantee over semi-government debt, provides an environment in which to examine these separate factors. We find little evidence that the factors proposed by reduced-form models can explain sovereign spreads, while, consistent with flights to liquidity, illiquidity risk is relevant particularly important during periods of market stress. These flights to liquidity are substantially more prominent at the shorter end of the term structure, whereas volatility predominantly explains longer-maturity sovereign spreads. The term spread of sovereign yields is shown to be negatively related to illiquidity during periods of stress, indicating that theoretical models that incorporate flights to liquidity need to be expanded to include the impact of such flights on both the level and slope of yields.

AB - Illiquidity and default risk are determinants of bond spreads that models suggest vary across market states. The Australian sovereign debt market, where the Australian government provided an explicit guarantee over semi-government debt, provides an environment in which to examine these separate factors. We find little evidence that the factors proposed by reduced-form models can explain sovereign spreads, while, consistent with flights to liquidity, illiquidity risk is relevant particularly important during periods of market stress. These flights to liquidity are substantially more prominent at the shorter end of the term structure, whereas volatility predominantly explains longer-maturity sovereign spreads. The term spread of sovereign yields is shown to be negatively related to illiquidity during periods of stress, indicating that theoretical models that incorporate flights to liquidity need to be expanded to include the impact of such flights on both the level and slope of yields.

KW - Illiquidity risk

KW - Sovereign debt

KW - Volatility

KW - Yield spreads

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007418226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 235

EP - 248

JO - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

JF - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

SN - 0927-538X

ER -