Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation

Gwenllian D. Iacona, William J. Sutherland, Bonnie Mappin, Vanessa M. Adams, Paul R. Armsworth, Tim Coleshaw, Carly Cook, Ian Craigie, Lynn V. Dicks, James A. Fitzsimons, Jennifer McGowan, Andrew J. Plumptre, Tal Polak, Andrew S. Pullin, Jeremy Ringma, Ian Rushworth, Andrea Santangeli, Annette Stewart, Ayesha Tulloch, Jessica C. Walsh & 1 others Hugh P. Possingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective conservation management interventions must combat threats and deliver benefits at costs that can be achieved within limited budgets. Considerable effort has focused on measuring the potential benefits of conservation interventions, but explicit quantification of the financial costs of implementation is rare. Even when costs have been quantified, haphazard and inconsistent reporting means published values are difficult to interpret. This reporting deficiency hinders progress toward a collective understanding of the financial costs of management interventions across projects and thus limits the ability to identify efficient solutions to conservation problems or attract adequate funding. We devised a standardized approach to describing financial costs reported for conservation interventions. The standards call for researchers and practitioners to describe the objective and outcome, context and methods, and scale of costed interventions, and to state which categories of costs are included and the currency and date for reported costs. These standards aim to provide enough contextual information that readers and future users can interpret the cost data appropriately. We suggest these standards be adopted by major conservation organizations, conservation science institutions, and journals so that cost reporting is comparable among studies. This would support shared learning and enhance the ability to identify and perform cost-effective conservation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)979-988
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Biology
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • conservation accountancy
  • conservation evidence
  • contabilidad en conservación
  • costo-beneficio
  • cost–benefit
  • effectiveness
  • evidencias de conservación
  • rentabilidad
  • return-on-investment

Cite this

Iacona, G. D., Sutherland, W. J., Mappin, B., Adams, V. M., Armsworth, P. R., Coleshaw, T., ... Possingham, H. P. (2018). Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 32(5), 979-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13195
Iacona, Gwenllian D. ; Sutherland, William J. ; Mappin, Bonnie ; Adams, Vanessa M. ; Armsworth, Paul R. ; Coleshaw, Tim ; Cook, Carly ; Craigie, Ian ; Dicks, Lynn V. ; Fitzsimons, James A. ; McGowan, Jennifer ; Plumptre, Andrew J. ; Polak, Tal ; Pullin, Andrew S. ; Ringma, Jeremy ; Rushworth, Ian ; Santangeli, Andrea ; Stewart, Annette ; Tulloch, Ayesha ; Walsh, Jessica C. ; Possingham, Hugh P. / Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation. In: Conservation Biology. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 979-988.
@article{259ce56fd8c44f669c07f8ed9e04628e,
title = "Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation",
abstract = "Effective conservation management interventions must combat threats and deliver benefits at costs that can be achieved within limited budgets. Considerable effort has focused on measuring the potential benefits of conservation interventions, but explicit quantification of the financial costs of implementation is rare. Even when costs have been quantified, haphazard and inconsistent reporting means published values are difficult to interpret. This reporting deficiency hinders progress toward a collective understanding of the financial costs of management interventions across projects and thus limits the ability to identify efficient solutions to conservation problems or attract adequate funding. We devised a standardized approach to describing financial costs reported for conservation interventions. The standards call for researchers and practitioners to describe the objective and outcome, context and methods, and scale of costed interventions, and to state which categories of costs are included and the currency and date for reported costs. These standards aim to provide enough contextual information that readers and future users can interpret the cost data appropriately. We suggest these standards be adopted by major conservation organizations, conservation science institutions, and journals so that cost reporting is comparable among studies. This would support shared learning and enhance the ability to identify and perform cost-effective conservation.",
keywords = "conservation accountancy, conservation evidence, contabilidad en conservaci{\'o}n, costo-beneficio, cost–benefit, effectiveness, evidencias de conservaci{\'o}n, rentabilidad, return-on-investment",
author = "Iacona, {Gwenllian D.} and Sutherland, {William J.} and Bonnie Mappin and Adams, {Vanessa M.} and Armsworth, {Paul R.} and Tim Coleshaw and Carly Cook and Ian Craigie and Dicks, {Lynn V.} and Fitzsimons, {James A.} and Jennifer McGowan and Plumptre, {Andrew J.} and Tal Polak and Pullin, {Andrew S.} and Jeremy Ringma and Ian Rushworth and Andrea Santangeli and Annette Stewart and Ayesha Tulloch and Walsh, {Jessica C.} and Possingham, {Hugh P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.13195",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "979--988",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Iacona, GD, Sutherland, WJ, Mappin, B, Adams, VM, Armsworth, PR, Coleshaw, T, Cook, C, Craigie, I, Dicks, LV, Fitzsimons, JA, McGowan, J, Plumptre, AJ, Polak, T, Pullin, AS, Ringma, J, Rushworth, I, Santangeli, A, Stewart, A, Tulloch, A, Walsh, JC & Possingham, HP 2018, 'Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation', Conservation Biology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 979-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13195

Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation. / Iacona, Gwenllian D.; Sutherland, William J.; Mappin, Bonnie; Adams, Vanessa M.; Armsworth, Paul R.; Coleshaw, Tim; Cook, Carly; Craigie, Ian; Dicks, Lynn V.; Fitzsimons, James A.; McGowan, Jennifer; Plumptre, Andrew J.; Polak, Tal; Pullin, Andrew S.; Ringma, Jeremy; Rushworth, Ian; Santangeli, Andrea; Stewart, Annette; Tulloch, Ayesha; Walsh, Jessica C.; Possingham, Hugh P.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 979-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation

AU - Iacona, Gwenllian D.

AU - Sutherland, William J.

AU - Mappin, Bonnie

AU - Adams, Vanessa M.

AU - Armsworth, Paul R.

AU - Coleshaw, Tim

AU - Cook, Carly

AU - Craigie, Ian

AU - Dicks, Lynn V.

AU - Fitzsimons, James A.

AU - McGowan, Jennifer

AU - Plumptre, Andrew J.

AU - Polak, Tal

AU - Pullin, Andrew S.

AU - Ringma, Jeremy

AU - Rushworth, Ian

AU - Santangeli, Andrea

AU - Stewart, Annette

AU - Tulloch, Ayesha

AU - Walsh, Jessica C.

AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Effective conservation management interventions must combat threats and deliver benefits at costs that can be achieved within limited budgets. Considerable effort has focused on measuring the potential benefits of conservation interventions, but explicit quantification of the financial costs of implementation is rare. Even when costs have been quantified, haphazard and inconsistent reporting means published values are difficult to interpret. This reporting deficiency hinders progress toward a collective understanding of the financial costs of management interventions across projects and thus limits the ability to identify efficient solutions to conservation problems or attract adequate funding. We devised a standardized approach to describing financial costs reported for conservation interventions. The standards call for researchers and practitioners to describe the objective and outcome, context and methods, and scale of costed interventions, and to state which categories of costs are included and the currency and date for reported costs. These standards aim to provide enough contextual information that readers and future users can interpret the cost data appropriately. We suggest these standards be adopted by major conservation organizations, conservation science institutions, and journals so that cost reporting is comparable among studies. This would support shared learning and enhance the ability to identify and perform cost-effective conservation.

AB - Effective conservation management interventions must combat threats and deliver benefits at costs that can be achieved within limited budgets. Considerable effort has focused on measuring the potential benefits of conservation interventions, but explicit quantification of the financial costs of implementation is rare. Even when costs have been quantified, haphazard and inconsistent reporting means published values are difficult to interpret. This reporting deficiency hinders progress toward a collective understanding of the financial costs of management interventions across projects and thus limits the ability to identify efficient solutions to conservation problems or attract adequate funding. We devised a standardized approach to describing financial costs reported for conservation interventions. The standards call for researchers and practitioners to describe the objective and outcome, context and methods, and scale of costed interventions, and to state which categories of costs are included and the currency and date for reported costs. These standards aim to provide enough contextual information that readers and future users can interpret the cost data appropriately. We suggest these standards be adopted by major conservation organizations, conservation science institutions, and journals so that cost reporting is comparable among studies. This would support shared learning and enhance the ability to identify and perform cost-effective conservation.

KW - conservation accountancy

KW - conservation evidence

KW - contabilidad en conservación

KW - costo-beneficio

KW - cost–benefit

KW - effectiveness

KW - evidencias de conservación

KW - rentabilidad

KW - return-on-investment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053600049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.13195

DO - 10.1111/cobi.13195

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 979

EP - 988

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 5

ER -

Iacona GD, Sutherland WJ, Mappin B, Adams VM, Armsworth PR, Coleshaw T et al. Standardized reporting of the costs of management interventions for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology. 2018 Oct 1;32(5):979-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13195