Stage one of Australia's transfer pricing changes: Public submissions (re)action

Diane Lynette Kraal, Ana Maria Lugo Marin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper concerns the 2011 Australian Government s then proposed changes to the transfer pricing rules, referred to as the stage one amendments, and the consultation process to provide interested parties with an opportunity to comment. The paper covers the external submissions received, with a focus on the dominant issues raised in the submissions regarding the planned changes to the transfer pricing rules. Also examined is the extent to which the issues advanced by the interested parties were included in the Bill that was tabled in parliament for debate, and finally enacted in September 2012 as Tax Laws Amendment (Cross-Border Transfer Pricing) Act (No. 1) 2012 (Cth). Using the methodology of grounded theory, we analyse 37 public submissions from the stage one consultations to ground a theory and explain the submitters issues of concern. The key concerns about the proposed amendments are: opposition to any retrospective powers; requests protection for taxpayers from penalties arising from a transfer pricing amendment; resistance to assigning separate taxing powers to Australian tax treaties; and a clear aversion to any discrimination against foreign related parties that are resident of a country that has a tax treaty with Australia. Transfer pricing literature is used to validate the results. While there were consistent patterns of concern in the submissions from the interested parties, the adoption of their requests was low in the stage one amendments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189 - 233
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Australian Taxation
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{73f970adbff04ed3a8620b2cb1d632b7,
title = "Stage one of Australia's transfer pricing changes: Public submissions (re)action",
abstract = "This paper concerns the 2011 Australian Government s then proposed changes to the transfer pricing rules, referred to as the stage one amendments, and the consultation process to provide interested parties with an opportunity to comment. The paper covers the external submissions received, with a focus on the dominant issues raised in the submissions regarding the planned changes to the transfer pricing rules. Also examined is the extent to which the issues advanced by the interested parties were included in the Bill that was tabled in parliament for debate, and finally enacted in September 2012 as Tax Laws Amendment (Cross-Border Transfer Pricing) Act (No. 1) 2012 (Cth). Using the methodology of grounded theory, we analyse 37 public submissions from the stage one consultations to ground a theory and explain the submitters issues of concern. The key concerns about the proposed amendments are: opposition to any retrospective powers; requests protection for taxpayers from penalties arising from a transfer pricing amendment; resistance to assigning separate taxing powers to Australian tax treaties; and a clear aversion to any discrimination against foreign related parties that are resident of a country that has a tax treaty with Australia. Transfer pricing literature is used to validate the results. While there were consistent patterns of concern in the submissions from the interested parties, the adoption of their requests was low in the stage one amendments.",
author = "Kraal, {Diane Lynette} and {Lugo Marin}, {Ana Maria}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "189 -- 233",
journal = "Journal of Australian Taxation",
issn = "1440-0405",
number = "1",

}

Stage one of Australia's transfer pricing changes: Public submissions (re)action. / Kraal, Diane Lynette; Lugo Marin, Ana Maria.

In: Journal of Australian Taxation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2013, p. 189 - 233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stage one of Australia's transfer pricing changes: Public submissions (re)action

AU - Kraal, Diane Lynette

AU - Lugo Marin, Ana Maria

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper concerns the 2011 Australian Government s then proposed changes to the transfer pricing rules, referred to as the stage one amendments, and the consultation process to provide interested parties with an opportunity to comment. The paper covers the external submissions received, with a focus on the dominant issues raised in the submissions regarding the planned changes to the transfer pricing rules. Also examined is the extent to which the issues advanced by the interested parties were included in the Bill that was tabled in parliament for debate, and finally enacted in September 2012 as Tax Laws Amendment (Cross-Border Transfer Pricing) Act (No. 1) 2012 (Cth). Using the methodology of grounded theory, we analyse 37 public submissions from the stage one consultations to ground a theory and explain the submitters issues of concern. The key concerns about the proposed amendments are: opposition to any retrospective powers; requests protection for taxpayers from penalties arising from a transfer pricing amendment; resistance to assigning separate taxing powers to Australian tax treaties; and a clear aversion to any discrimination against foreign related parties that are resident of a country that has a tax treaty with Australia. Transfer pricing literature is used to validate the results. While there were consistent patterns of concern in the submissions from the interested parties, the adoption of their requests was low in the stage one amendments.

AB - This paper concerns the 2011 Australian Government s then proposed changes to the transfer pricing rules, referred to as the stage one amendments, and the consultation process to provide interested parties with an opportunity to comment. The paper covers the external submissions received, with a focus on the dominant issues raised in the submissions regarding the planned changes to the transfer pricing rules. Also examined is the extent to which the issues advanced by the interested parties were included in the Bill that was tabled in parliament for debate, and finally enacted in September 2012 as Tax Laws Amendment (Cross-Border Transfer Pricing) Act (No. 1) 2012 (Cth). Using the methodology of grounded theory, we analyse 37 public submissions from the stage one consultations to ground a theory and explain the submitters issues of concern. The key concerns about the proposed amendments are: opposition to any retrospective powers; requests protection for taxpayers from penalties arising from a transfer pricing amendment; resistance to assigning separate taxing powers to Australian tax treaties; and a clear aversion to any discrimination against foreign related parties that are resident of a country that has a tax treaty with Australia. Transfer pricing literature is used to validate the results. While there were consistent patterns of concern in the submissions from the interested parties, the adoption of their requests was low in the stage one amendments.

UR - http://69.195.124.80/~jausttax/past-issues/volume-15-issue-1/

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 189

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Australian Taxation

JF - Journal of Australian Taxation

SN - 1440-0405

IS - 1

ER -