Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools

Jennifer Bleazby

Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools

Education Clayton

Research output: Other contribution › Other

Abstract

Since 1866, all state schools in New South Wales (NSW) have been required to offer courses in religious education. However, in 2011, NSW schools introduced philosophy based ethics classes as an alternative to these courses in religious education. Controversy ensued. Detractors of the religious education courses accuse them of indoctrination, discouraging students in processes of critical thought. Conversely, detractors of philosophy based ethics class accuse them of encouraging moral relativism. Some families choose to opt their children out of both the religious education classes and the ethics classes. Among this group of parents, some are concerned that the religious education doesn’t reflect the views of their particular faith, while the ethics classes are too atheistic. This case, Special Religious Education vs. Philosophy Based Ethics in Australian Primary Schools, explores the competing claims of supporters of religious education and supporters of philosophy based ethics, as well as those unhappy with both options. How should state schools teach ethics and moral reasoning? How should they approach the relationship between religiously and secularly grounded ethics, especially in light of diversity in religious belief?

Original language	English
Type	case study written to be used for teaching purposes
Publisher	Justice in Schools
Number of pages	5
Place of Publication	Cambridge Massachusetts USA
Publication status	Published - 23 Oct 2018

Keywords

religious education
ethics education
philosophy in schools
teacher education

Cite this

Bleazby, J. (2018, Oct 23). Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools. Cambridge Massachusetts USA: Justice in Schools.

Bleazby, Jennifer. / Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools. 2018. Cambridge Massachusetts USA : Justice in Schools. 5 p.

@misc{617be8ba14b14bd899cdfa0b9d36cccd,

title = "Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools",

abstract = "Since 1866, all state schools in New South Wales (NSW) have been required to offer courses in religious education. However, in 2011, NSW schools introduced philosophy based ethics classes as an alternative to these courses in religious education. Controversy ensued. Detractors of the religious education courses accuse them of indoctrination, discouraging students in processes of critical thought. Conversely, detractors of philosophy based ethics class accuse them of encouraging moral relativism. Some families choose to opt their children out of both the religious education classes and the ethics classes. Among this group of parents, some are concerned that the religious education doesn’t reflect the views of their particular faith, while the ethics classes are too atheistic. This case, Special Religious Education vs. Philosophy Based Ethics in Australian Primary Schools, explores the competing claims of supporters of religious education and supporters of philosophy based ethics, as well as those unhappy with both options. How should state schools teach ethics and moral reasoning? How should they approach the relationship between religiously and secularly grounded ethics, especially in light of diversity in religious belief?",

keywords = "religious education, ethics education, philosophy in schools, teacher education",

author = "Jennifer Bleazby",

year = "2018",

month = "10",

day = "23",

language = "English",

publisher = "Justice in Schools",

type = "Other",

}

Bleazby, J 2018, Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools. Justice in Schools, Cambridge Massachusetts USA.

Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools. / Bleazby, Jennifer.

5 p. Cambridge Massachusetts USA : Justice in Schools. 2018, case study written to be used for teaching purposes.

Research output: Other contribution › Other

TY - GEN

T1 - Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools

AU - Bleazby, Jennifer

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Since 1866, all state schools in New South Wales (NSW) have been required to offer courses in religious education. However, in 2011, NSW schools introduced philosophy based ethics classes as an alternative to these courses in religious education. Controversy ensued. Detractors of the religious education courses accuse them of indoctrination, discouraging students in processes of critical thought. Conversely, detractors of philosophy based ethics class accuse them of encouraging moral relativism. Some families choose to opt their children out of both the religious education classes and the ethics classes. Among this group of parents, some are concerned that the religious education doesn’t reflect the views of their particular faith, while the ethics classes are too atheistic. This case, Special Religious Education vs. Philosophy Based Ethics in Australian Primary Schools, explores the competing claims of supporters of religious education and supporters of philosophy based ethics, as well as those unhappy with both options. How should state schools teach ethics and moral reasoning? How should they approach the relationship between religiously and secularly grounded ethics, especially in light of diversity in religious belief?

AB - Since 1866, all state schools in New South Wales (NSW) have been required to offer courses in religious education. However, in 2011, NSW schools introduced philosophy based ethics classes as an alternative to these courses in religious education. Controversy ensued. Detractors of the religious education courses accuse them of indoctrination, discouraging students in processes of critical thought. Conversely, detractors of philosophy based ethics class accuse them of encouraging moral relativism. Some families choose to opt their children out of both the religious education classes and the ethics classes. Among this group of parents, some are concerned that the religious education doesn’t reflect the views of their particular faith, while the ethics classes are too atheistic. This case, Special Religious Education vs. Philosophy Based Ethics in Australian Primary Schools, explores the competing claims of supporters of religious education and supporters of philosophy based ethics, as well as those unhappy with both options. How should state schools teach ethics and moral reasoning? How should they approach the relationship between religiously and secularly grounded ethics, especially in light of diversity in religious belief?

KW - religious education

KW - ethics education

KW - philosophy in schools

KW - teacher education

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Justice in Schools

CY - Cambridge Massachusetts USA

ER -

Bleazby J. Special religious education vs. philosophy based ethics in Australian primary schools. 2018. 5 p.