TY - JOUR
T1 - Sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of effective and less effective contraceptive methods
T2 - findings from the Understanding Fertility Management in Contemporary Australia survey
AU - Freilich, Karen
AU - Holton, Sara
AU - Rowe, Heather
AU - Kirkman, Maggie
AU - Jordan, Lynne
AU - McNamee, Kathleen
AU - Bayly, Christine
AU - McBain, John
AU - Sinnott, Vikki
AU - Fisher, Jane
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objective: Unintended pregnancy and abortion may, in part, result from suboptimal use of effective contraception. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic factors associated with the use of effective and less effective methods among women and men of reproductive age living in Australia. Methods: In a cross-sectional national survey, 1544 women and men aged 18–51 were identified as being at risk of pregnancy. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the sociodemographic factors related to contraceptive use. Results: Most respondents (n = 1307, 84.7%) reported using a method of contraception. Use of any contraceptive was associated with being born in Australia (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]1.186, 3.01; p = .008), having English as a first language (OR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.04; p = .026), having private health insurance (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.66, 3.04; p < .001), and not considering religion important to fertility choices (OR 0.43; 95%CI 0.31, 0.60; p < .001). A third used effective contraceptive methods (n = 534, 34.6%; permanent methods: 23.1%, and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC): 11.4%). Permanent methods were more likely to be used in rural areas (OR 0.62; 95%CI 0.46, 0.84; p = .002). Use of the least effective, short-term methods was reported by nearly half (condoms: 25.6%, withdrawal: 12.5%, and fertility-awareness-based methods: 2.8%). Those who relied on withdrawal were more likely to live in a metropolitan area (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.95, 4.18; p < .001), and not have private health insurance (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.38, 0.71; p < .001). Conclusions: Targeted promotion of the broad range of available contraceptives may raise awareness and uptake of more effective methods and improve reproductive autonomy in certain population groups. © 2017 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health
AB - Objective: Unintended pregnancy and abortion may, in part, result from suboptimal use of effective contraception. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic factors associated with the use of effective and less effective methods among women and men of reproductive age living in Australia. Methods: In a cross-sectional national survey, 1544 women and men aged 18–51 were identified as being at risk of pregnancy. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the sociodemographic factors related to contraceptive use. Results: Most respondents (n = 1307, 84.7%) reported using a method of contraception. Use of any contraceptive was associated with being born in Australia (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]1.186, 3.01; p = .008), having English as a first language (OR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.04; p = .026), having private health insurance (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.66, 3.04; p < .001), and not considering religion important to fertility choices (OR 0.43; 95%CI 0.31, 0.60; p < .001). A third used effective contraceptive methods (n = 534, 34.6%; permanent methods: 23.1%, and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC): 11.4%). Permanent methods were more likely to be used in rural areas (OR 0.62; 95%CI 0.46, 0.84; p = .002). Use of the least effective, short-term methods was reported by nearly half (condoms: 25.6%, withdrawal: 12.5%, and fertility-awareness-based methods: 2.8%). Those who relied on withdrawal were more likely to live in a metropolitan area (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.95, 4.18; p < .001), and not have private health insurance (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.38, 0.71; p < .001). Conclusions: Targeted promotion of the broad range of available contraceptives may raise awareness and uptake of more effective methods and improve reproductive autonomy in certain population groups. © 2017 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health
U2 - 10.1080/13625187.2017.1304534
DO - 10.1080/13625187.2017.1304534
M3 - Article
SN - 1362-5187
VL - 22
SP - 212
EP - 221
JO - The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
JF - The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
IS - 3
ER -