Social workers as collaborators? The ethics of working within Australia’s asylum system

Christopher Maylea, Asher Hirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social workers working within the Australian asylum seeker processing system, particularly offshore on Nauru and Manus Island, risk being collaborators in the systemic abuse of men, women and children who seek asylum in Australia. In order to avoid accusations of collaboration, social workers must work to end this abuse. However, the current policy environment makes this very difficult, with social workers who resist the status quo risking unemployment, public shaming and imprisonment. Using freedom of information disclosures, whistleblower testimony, leaked documents, parliamentary records, case law, media reports and academic literature, this paper examines this difficult position. Alternatives to retreating from the system are proposed, including advocacy through whistleblowing, policy reform and litigation, or subversive action from within. Social workers are encouraged to act in whatever ways they can, within the ethical, legal and practical limitations which are imposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-178
Number of pages19
JournalEthics and Social Welfare
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Asylum seeker
  • boycott
  • litigation
  • Manus Island
  • Nauru
  • policy
  • refugee
  • social work
  • subversion
  • subversive
  • whistleblowing

Cite this