Social practices of 3D printing: decentralising control and reconfiguring regulation

Luke Heemsbergen, Robbie Fordyce, Bjorn Nansen, Thomas Apperley, Mike Arnold, Thomas Birtchnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper considers the social practices of 3D printing by comparing consumer perspectives and practices with legal scholarship on intellectual property regimes. The paper draws on data gained through a mixed-methods approach involving participant observation, focus groups, and social network analysis of 3D printing file-sharing practices. It finds that while consumers display a level of naivety about their 3D printing rights and responsibilities as individuals, they possess a latent understanding about broader digital economies that guide their practices. We suggest that the social practices associated with 3D printing function through communication networks to decentralise manufacture and reconfigure legal capacities for regulation. The paper concludes by introducing nascent paths forward for policy frames across industry, government and consumer concern to address the opportunities and challenges of 3D printing's evolving interface with society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-125
Number of pages16
JournalAustralian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 3D Printing
  • Copyright
  • Design
  • Intellectual property
  • Mixed-methods
  • Patents
  • Peer-production
  • Social network analysis
  • Trademarks

Cite this

Heemsbergen, Luke ; Fordyce, Robbie ; Nansen, Bjorn ; Apperley, Thomas ; Arnold, Mike ; Birtchnell, Thomas. / Social practices of 3D printing : decentralising control and reconfiguring regulation. In: Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 110-125.
@article{304efbc98af94374b82d490247fbaecc,
title = "Social practices of 3D printing: decentralising control and reconfiguring regulation",
abstract = "This paper considers the social practices of 3D printing by comparing consumer perspectives and practices with legal scholarship on intellectual property regimes. The paper draws on data gained through a mixed-methods approach involving participant observation, focus groups, and social network analysis of 3D printing file-sharing practices. It finds that while consumers display a level of naivety about their 3D printing rights and responsibilities as individuals, they possess a latent understanding about broader digital economies that guide their practices. We suggest that the social practices associated with 3D printing function through communication networks to decentralise manufacture and reconfigure legal capacities for regulation. The paper concludes by introducing nascent paths forward for policy frames across industry, government and consumer concern to address the opportunities and challenges of 3D printing's evolving interface with society.",
keywords = "3D Printing, Copyright, Design, Intellectual property, Mixed-methods, Patents, Peer-production, Social network analysis, Trademarks",
author = "Luke Heemsbergen and Robbie Fordyce and Bjorn Nansen and Thomas Apperley and Mike Arnold and Thomas Birtchnell",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18080/ajtde.v4n3.64",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "110--125",
journal = "Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy",
issn = "2203-1693",
publisher = "Monash University ePress",
number = "3",

}

Social practices of 3D printing : decentralising control and reconfiguring regulation. / Heemsbergen, Luke; Fordyce, Robbie; Nansen, Bjorn; Apperley, Thomas; Arnold, Mike; Birtchnell, Thomas.

In: Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 110-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social practices of 3D printing

T2 - decentralising control and reconfiguring regulation

AU - Heemsbergen, Luke

AU - Fordyce, Robbie

AU - Nansen, Bjorn

AU - Apperley, Thomas

AU - Arnold, Mike

AU - Birtchnell, Thomas

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This paper considers the social practices of 3D printing by comparing consumer perspectives and practices with legal scholarship on intellectual property regimes. The paper draws on data gained through a mixed-methods approach involving participant observation, focus groups, and social network analysis of 3D printing file-sharing practices. It finds that while consumers display a level of naivety about their 3D printing rights and responsibilities as individuals, they possess a latent understanding about broader digital economies that guide their practices. We suggest that the social practices associated with 3D printing function through communication networks to decentralise manufacture and reconfigure legal capacities for regulation. The paper concludes by introducing nascent paths forward for policy frames across industry, government and consumer concern to address the opportunities and challenges of 3D printing's evolving interface with society.

AB - This paper considers the social practices of 3D printing by comparing consumer perspectives and practices with legal scholarship on intellectual property regimes. The paper draws on data gained through a mixed-methods approach involving participant observation, focus groups, and social network analysis of 3D printing file-sharing practices. It finds that while consumers display a level of naivety about their 3D printing rights and responsibilities as individuals, they possess a latent understanding about broader digital economies that guide their practices. We suggest that the social practices associated with 3D printing function through communication networks to decentralise manufacture and reconfigure legal capacities for regulation. The paper concludes by introducing nascent paths forward for policy frames across industry, government and consumer concern to address the opportunities and challenges of 3D printing's evolving interface with society.

KW - 3D Printing

KW - Copyright

KW - Design

KW - Intellectual property

KW - Mixed-methods

KW - Patents

KW - Peer-production

KW - Social network analysis

KW - Trademarks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013001622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18080/ajtde.v4n3.64

DO - 10.18080/ajtde.v4n3.64

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 110

EP - 125

JO - Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy

JF - Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy

SN - 2203-1693

IS - 3

ER -