Social media in archives and libraries: A snapshot of planning, evaluation, and preservation decisions

Chern Li Liew, Vanessa King, Gillian Oliver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports the findings from research which explored decision making and practices underpinning the implementation or non-adoption of social media in archives and libraries worldwide. Archives and libraries continue to face demands, whether from senior management, funding agencies, the government, or taxpayers to demonstrate accountability. Evaluation provides evidence to meet such demands and to gain, validate, or sustain support for programs and activities. Being able to show success is a key step for archives and libraries that need to rationalize or win support for the continuance of their social media efforts. Related to this are questions about whether or not there should be a preservation strategy for the content of social media as well as a plan for sustainability of infrastructure to support these activities. Our survey findings suggest that archives and libraries know that they are not necessarily choosing the evaluation methods that can best demonstrate the achievement of their intentions, and furthermore that they lack strategies and policies for preservation and sustainability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalPreservation, Digital Technology and Culture
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{6105ff7d0408441b9b61d222951cb712,
title = "Social media in archives and libraries: A snapshot of planning, evaluation, and preservation decisions",
abstract = "This paper reports the findings from research which explored decision making and practices underpinning the implementation or non-adoption of social media in archives and libraries worldwide. Archives and libraries continue to face demands, whether from senior management, funding agencies, the government, or taxpayers to demonstrate accountability. Evaluation provides evidence to meet such demands and to gain, validate, or sustain support for programs and activities. Being able to show success is a key step for archives and libraries that need to rationalize or win support for the continuance of their social media efforts. Related to this are questions about whether or not there should be a preservation strategy for the content of social media as well as a plan for sustainability of infrastructure to support these activities. Our survey findings suggest that archives and libraries know that they are not necessarily choosing the evaluation methods that can best demonstrate the achievement of their intentions, and furthermore that they lack strategies and policies for preservation and sustainability.",
author = "Liew, {Chern Li} and Vanessa King and Gillian Oliver",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1515/pdtc-2014-0023",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture",
issn = "2195-2965",
number = "1",

}

Social media in archives and libraries : A snapshot of planning, evaluation, and preservation decisions. / Liew, Chern Li; King, Vanessa; Oliver, Gillian.

In: Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2015, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social media in archives and libraries

T2 - A snapshot of planning, evaluation, and preservation decisions

AU - Liew, Chern Li

AU - King, Vanessa

AU - Oliver, Gillian

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper reports the findings from research which explored decision making and practices underpinning the implementation or non-adoption of social media in archives and libraries worldwide. Archives and libraries continue to face demands, whether from senior management, funding agencies, the government, or taxpayers to demonstrate accountability. Evaluation provides evidence to meet such demands and to gain, validate, or sustain support for programs and activities. Being able to show success is a key step for archives and libraries that need to rationalize or win support for the continuance of their social media efforts. Related to this are questions about whether or not there should be a preservation strategy for the content of social media as well as a plan for sustainability of infrastructure to support these activities. Our survey findings suggest that archives and libraries know that they are not necessarily choosing the evaluation methods that can best demonstrate the achievement of their intentions, and furthermore that they lack strategies and policies for preservation and sustainability.

AB - This paper reports the findings from research which explored decision making and practices underpinning the implementation or non-adoption of social media in archives and libraries worldwide. Archives and libraries continue to face demands, whether from senior management, funding agencies, the government, or taxpayers to demonstrate accountability. Evaluation provides evidence to meet such demands and to gain, validate, or sustain support for programs and activities. Being able to show success is a key step for archives and libraries that need to rationalize or win support for the continuance of their social media efforts. Related to this are questions about whether or not there should be a preservation strategy for the content of social media as well as a plan for sustainability of infrastructure to support these activities. Our survey findings suggest that archives and libraries know that they are not necessarily choosing the evaluation methods that can best demonstrate the achievement of their intentions, and furthermore that they lack strategies and policies for preservation and sustainability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924955277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/pdtc-2014-0023

DO - 10.1515/pdtc-2014-0023

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture

JF - Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture

SN - 2195-2965

IS - 1

ER -