Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming

Herle Mo Madsen, Rebekah Ruth Brown, Morten Elle, Peter Steen Mikkelsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urban stormwater systems in cities around the world are challenged by urbanization and climate change, and a range of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) are being implemented as solutions to these challenges. We developed a conceptual framework of technological stabilization based on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Transition Science, and conducted 16 in-depth actor interviews as a basis for mapping the historical development of in the two cities. The SCMs applied in Melbourne and Copenhagen are similar, but using a new framework for technological stabilization we identify differences in their application due to different physical, organizational and cultural contexts in the two cities, drought being the main driver during the past decade in Melbourne (1997–2010) and pluvial flooding in Copenhagen (2007-). In Melbourne there is currently a strong integrated understanding of SCMs: after decades of “new technology” development, “testing” and “opportunity” seeking a large degree of “agreement” about stormwater management as a mainstreamed professional practice has arisen. In Copenhagen there are currently multiple conflicting understandings of SCMs and signs of an emerging integrated understanding that offers “opportunities” for further development and implementation. It is clear from Melbourne's history that: successful full scale demonstration projects supported and developed by a wide range of actors helps building a common vision for SCM technologies, supportive policies across several governmental levels provide incentives for implementation, and inclusive actions in the closure process provides a sense of ownership for SCM technologies across disciplines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-209
Number of pages12
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Cities
  • Social construction of technology
  • Sociotechnical systems
  • Stormwater management
  • Water management
  • Water sensitive urban design

Cite this

@article{8cf8c44b058f445a98f6377173ea7c1a,
title = "Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming",
abstract = "Urban stormwater systems in cities around the world are challenged by urbanization and climate change, and a range of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) are being implemented as solutions to these challenges. We developed a conceptual framework of technological stabilization based on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Transition Science, and conducted 16 in-depth actor interviews as a basis for mapping the historical development of in the two cities. The SCMs applied in Melbourne and Copenhagen are similar, but using a new framework for technological stabilization we identify differences in their application due to different physical, organizational and cultural contexts in the two cities, drought being the main driver during the past decade in Melbourne (1997–2010) and pluvial flooding in Copenhagen (2007-). In Melbourne there is currently a strong integrated understanding of SCMs: after decades of “new technology” development, “testing” and “opportunity” seeking a large degree of “agreement” about stormwater management as a mainstreamed professional practice has arisen. In Copenhagen there are currently multiple conflicting understandings of SCMs and signs of an emerging integrated understanding that offers “opportunities” for further development and implementation. It is clear from Melbourne's history that: successful full scale demonstration projects supported and developed by a wide range of actors helps building a common vision for SCM technologies, supportive policies across several governmental levels provide incentives for implementation, and inclusive actions in the closure process provides a sense of ownership for SCM technologies across disciplines.",
keywords = "Cities, Social construction of technology, Sociotechnical systems, Stormwater management, Water management, Water sensitive urban design",
author = "Madsen, {Herle Mo} and Brown, {Rebekah Ruth} and Morten Elle and Mikkelsen, {Peter Steen}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "198--209",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen : A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming. / Madsen, Herle Mo; Brown, Rebekah Ruth; Elle, Morten; Mikkelsen, Peter Steen.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 115, 01.02.2017, p. 198-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen

T2 - A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming

AU - Madsen, Herle Mo

AU - Brown, Rebekah Ruth

AU - Elle, Morten

AU - Mikkelsen, Peter Steen

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Urban stormwater systems in cities around the world are challenged by urbanization and climate change, and a range of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) are being implemented as solutions to these challenges. We developed a conceptual framework of technological stabilization based on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Transition Science, and conducted 16 in-depth actor interviews as a basis for mapping the historical development of in the two cities. The SCMs applied in Melbourne and Copenhagen are similar, but using a new framework for technological stabilization we identify differences in their application due to different physical, organizational and cultural contexts in the two cities, drought being the main driver during the past decade in Melbourne (1997–2010) and pluvial flooding in Copenhagen (2007-). In Melbourne there is currently a strong integrated understanding of SCMs: after decades of “new technology” development, “testing” and “opportunity” seeking a large degree of “agreement” about stormwater management as a mainstreamed professional practice has arisen. In Copenhagen there are currently multiple conflicting understandings of SCMs and signs of an emerging integrated understanding that offers “opportunities” for further development and implementation. It is clear from Melbourne's history that: successful full scale demonstration projects supported and developed by a wide range of actors helps building a common vision for SCM technologies, supportive policies across several governmental levels provide incentives for implementation, and inclusive actions in the closure process provides a sense of ownership for SCM technologies across disciplines.

AB - Urban stormwater systems in cities around the world are challenged by urbanization and climate change, and a range of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) are being implemented as solutions to these challenges. We developed a conceptual framework of technological stabilization based on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Transition Science, and conducted 16 in-depth actor interviews as a basis for mapping the historical development of in the two cities. The SCMs applied in Melbourne and Copenhagen are similar, but using a new framework for technological stabilization we identify differences in their application due to different physical, organizational and cultural contexts in the two cities, drought being the main driver during the past decade in Melbourne (1997–2010) and pluvial flooding in Copenhagen (2007-). In Melbourne there is currently a strong integrated understanding of SCMs: after decades of “new technology” development, “testing” and “opportunity” seeking a large degree of “agreement” about stormwater management as a mainstreamed professional practice has arisen. In Copenhagen there are currently multiple conflicting understandings of SCMs and signs of an emerging integrated understanding that offers “opportunities” for further development and implementation. It is clear from Melbourne's history that: successful full scale demonstration projects supported and developed by a wide range of actors helps building a common vision for SCM technologies, supportive policies across several governmental levels provide incentives for implementation, and inclusive actions in the closure process provides a sense of ownership for SCM technologies across disciplines.

KW - Cities

KW - Social construction of technology

KW - Sociotechnical systems

KW - Stormwater management

KW - Water management

KW - Water sensitive urban design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990818457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990818457

VL - 115

SP - 198

EP - 209

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -