TY - JOUR
T1 - SMART-SLE
T2 - serology monitoring and repeat testing in systemic lupus erythematosus—an analysis of anti-double-stranded DNA monitoring
AU - Yeo, Ai Li
AU - Kandane-Rathnayake, Rangi
AU - Koelmeyer, Rachel
AU - Golder, Vera
AU - Louthrenoo, Worawit
AU - Chen, Yi Hsing
AU - Cho, Jiacai
AU - Lateef, Aisha
AU - Hamijoyo, Laniyati
AU - Luo, Shue Fen
AU - Wu, Yeong Jian J.
AU - Navarra, Sandra V.
AU - Zamora, Leonid
AU - Li, Zhanguo
AU - An, Yuan
AU - Sockalingam, Sargunan
AU - Katsumata, Yasuhiro
AU - Harigai, Masayoshi
AU - Hao, Yanjie
AU - Zhang, Zhuoli
AU - Basnayake, B. M.D.B.
AU - Chan, Madelynn
AU - Kikuchi, Jun
AU - Takeuchi, Tsutomu
AU - Bae, Sang Cheol
AU - Oon, Shereen
AU - O’Neill, Sean
AU - Goldblatt, Fiona
AU - Ng, Kristine Pek Ling
AU - Law, Annie
AU - Tugnet, Nicola
AU - Kumar, Sunil
AU - Tee, Cherica
AU - Tee, Michael
AU - Ohkubo, Naoaki
AU - Tanaka, Yoshiya
AU - Lau, Chak Sing
AU - Nikpour, Mandana
AU - Hoi, Alberta
AU - Leech, Michelle
AU - Morand, Eric F.
AU - for the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration
N1 - Funding Information:
The APLC has received unrestricted project grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Serono, and UCB in support of data collection contributing to this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Objective: Disease activity monitoring in SLE includes serial measurement of anti-double stranded-DNA (dsDNA) antibodies, but in patients who are persistently anti-dsDNA positive, the utility of repeated measurement is unclear. We investigated the usefulness of serial anti-dsDNA testing in predicting flare in SLE patients who are persistently anti-dsDNA positive. Methods: Data were analysed from patients in a multinational longitudinal cohort with known anti-dsDNA results from 2013 to 2021. Patients were categorized based on their anti-dsDNA results as persistently negative, fluctuating or persistently positive. Cox regression models were used to examine longitudinal associations of anti-dsDNA results with flare. Results: Data from 37 582 visits of 3484 patients were analysed. Of the patients 1029 (29.5%) had persistently positive anti-dsDNA and 1195 (34.3%) had fluctuating results. Anti-dsDNA expressed as a ratio to the normal cut-off was associated with the risk of subsequent flare, including in the persistently positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.56; 95% CI: 1.30, 1.87; P<0.001) and fluctuating cohort (adjusted HR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.66), both for a ratio >3. Both increases and decreases in anti-dsDNA more than 2-fold compared with the previous visit were associated with increased risk of flare in the fluctuating cohort (adjusted HR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.65; P¼0.008) and the persistently positive cohort (adjusted HR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.71; P¼0.009). Conclusion: Absolute value and change in anti-dsDNA titres predict flares, including in persistently anti-dsDNA positive patients. This indicates that repeat monitoring of dsDNA has value in routine testing.
AB - Objective: Disease activity monitoring in SLE includes serial measurement of anti-double stranded-DNA (dsDNA) antibodies, but in patients who are persistently anti-dsDNA positive, the utility of repeated measurement is unclear. We investigated the usefulness of serial anti-dsDNA testing in predicting flare in SLE patients who are persistently anti-dsDNA positive. Methods: Data were analysed from patients in a multinational longitudinal cohort with known anti-dsDNA results from 2013 to 2021. Patients were categorized based on their anti-dsDNA results as persistently negative, fluctuating or persistently positive. Cox regression models were used to examine longitudinal associations of anti-dsDNA results with flare. Results: Data from 37 582 visits of 3484 patients were analysed. Of the patients 1029 (29.5%) had persistently positive anti-dsDNA and 1195 (34.3%) had fluctuating results. Anti-dsDNA expressed as a ratio to the normal cut-off was associated with the risk of subsequent flare, including in the persistently positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.56; 95% CI: 1.30, 1.87; P<0.001) and fluctuating cohort (adjusted HR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.66), both for a ratio >3. Both increases and decreases in anti-dsDNA more than 2-fold compared with the previous visit were associated with increased risk of flare in the fluctuating cohort (adjusted HR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.65; P¼0.008) and the persistently positive cohort (adjusted HR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.71; P¼0.009). Conclusion: Absolute value and change in anti-dsDNA titres predict flares, including in persistently anti-dsDNA positive patients. This indicates that repeat monitoring of dsDNA has value in routine testing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164946834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/rheumatology/kead231
DO - 10.1093/rheumatology/kead231
M3 - Article
C2 - 37208196
AN - SCOPUS:85164946834
SN - 1462-0324
VL - 63
SP - 525
EP - 533
JO - Rheumatology
JF - Rheumatology
IS - 2
ER -