TY - JOUR
T1 - Skinks in Zoos
T2 - A global approach on distribution patterns of threatened Scincidae in zoological institutions
AU - Wahle, Anna
AU - Rödder, Dennis
AU - Chapple, David G.
AU - Meiri, Shai
AU - Rauhaus, Anna
AU - Ziegler, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Prof. Dr. Aaron Bauer (Villanova University, Pennsylvania), Prof. Dr. Lee Grismer (La Sierra University, Riverside) and Matt Goetz (Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust) for their improvements of a previous manuscript version. David Chapple was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council ( FT200100108 ). This study was supported by Cologne Zoo. Cologne Zoo is partner of the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA): Conservation Projects 07011 , 07012 (Herpetodiversity Research, Amphibian and Reptilian Breeding and Rescue Stations).
Funding Information:
We thank Prof. Dr. Aaron Bauer (Villanova University, Pennsylvania), Prof. Dr. Lee Grismer (La Sierra University, Riverside) and Matt Goetz (Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust) for their improvements of a previous manuscript version. David Chapple was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (FT200100108). This study was supported by Cologne Zoo. Cologne Zoo is partner of the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA): Conservation Projects 07011, 07012 (Herpetodiversity Research, Amphibian and Reptilian Breeding and Rescue Stations).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - To manage populations of threatened species according to the IUCN's One Plan Approach, knowledge about both in situ and ex situ populations is required. To enhance the conservation of threatened skinks and to gain an overview which skink species are kept in zoos, and thus already have an ex situ conservation component, we analysed data from the Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS): their individual numbers, breeding success, and the number of holding institutions. We categorised species as threatened or non-threatened based on IUCN Red List assessments. Only 92 (~5%) of 1727 recognized skink species are held in ZIMS institutions worldwide, mostly in Australia, Europe, and North America. 77% of the species kept globally are classified as non-threatened and ~23% (21 species) are threatened. Only 28% of the species kept have successfully bred in the last year, mostly in one zoo each. Of these seven species were threatened. All threatened species are kept by four zoos at most, generally only in one. Half of the skink species kept are represented by less than 10 individuals. Mainly Australian skink species were kept. To improve the conservation of threatened skinks, a shift towards keeping threatened species should be considered within captive management programmes. European and North American zoos offer capacities and expertise for skink conservation but are outside skink species richness hotspots. Cooperative projects with institutions and stations in such hotspots could greatly benefit the conservation of skinks. Thus, according to the One Plan Approach, the ex situ populations could directly contribute to in situ protection.
AB - To manage populations of threatened species according to the IUCN's One Plan Approach, knowledge about both in situ and ex situ populations is required. To enhance the conservation of threatened skinks and to gain an overview which skink species are kept in zoos, and thus already have an ex situ conservation component, we analysed data from the Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS): their individual numbers, breeding success, and the number of holding institutions. We categorised species as threatened or non-threatened based on IUCN Red List assessments. Only 92 (~5%) of 1727 recognized skink species are held in ZIMS institutions worldwide, mostly in Australia, Europe, and North America. 77% of the species kept globally are classified as non-threatened and ~23% (21 species) are threatened. Only 28% of the species kept have successfully bred in the last year, mostly in one zoo each. Of these seven species were threatened. All threatened species are kept by four zoos at most, generally only in one. Half of the skink species kept are represented by less than 10 individuals. Mainly Australian skink species were kept. To improve the conservation of threatened skinks, a shift towards keeping threatened species should be considered within captive management programmes. European and North American zoos offer capacities and expertise for skink conservation but are outside skink species richness hotspots. Cooperative projects with institutions and stations in such hotspots could greatly benefit the conservation of skinks. Thus, according to the One Plan Approach, the ex situ populations could directly contribute to in situ protection.
KW - Conservation breeding
KW - ex situ populations
KW - Skinks
KW - Species selection
KW - ZIMS
KW - Zoos
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114841200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01800
DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01800
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114841200
SN - 2351-9894
VL - 30
JO - Global Ecology and Conservation
JF - Global Ecology and Conservation
M1 - e01800
ER -