Abstract
This paper reports on a series of three similar graph drawing empirical studies, and describes the results of investigating subtle variations on the experimental method. Its purpose is two-fold: to report the results of the experiments, as well as to illustrate how easy it is to inadvertently make conclusions that may not stand up to scrutiny. While the results of the initial experiment were validated, instances of speculative conclusions and inherent bias were identified. This research highlights the importance of stating the limitations of any experiment, being clear about conclusions that are speculative, and not assuming that (even minor) experimental decisions will not affect the results.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Graph Drawing - 21st International Symposium, GD 2013, Revised Selected Papers |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 232-243 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783319038407 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | Graph Drawing 2013 - Bordeaux, France Duration: 23 Sept 2013 → 25 Sept 2013 Conference number: 21st https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-03841-4 (Proceedings) |
Publication series
Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
---|---|
Volume | 8242 LNCS |
ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1611-3349 |
Conference
Conference | Graph Drawing 2013 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | GD 2013 |
Country/Territory | France |
City | Bordeaux |
Period | 23/09/13 → 25/09/13 |
Other | Graph Drawing: 21st International Symposium, GD 2013, Revised Selected Papers |
Internet address |
|
Keywords
- Empirical studies
- Graph sketching
- Limitations
- Replication