Sitting in the gap: Ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness

Liam M. Brady, Amanda Kearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For close to six decades, ethnoarchaeology has studied the present to better understand the past. However, if understanding the past is paramount, then what of the wishes and interests of those with whom we collaborate in the present? This situation raises questions such as who is ethnoarchaeology for, and how might its outcomes be valuable to both researchers and collaborators? We address these issues by focusing on the space in which researchers operate, namely the ‘gap’ between archaeological and Indigenous conceptualizations of the world, and propose methodological openness to help achieve new ways of thinking about ethnoarchaeology. Drawing on our experiences conducting rock art research in Australia and the American Southwest, we describe the complexities that emerged during conversations with Yanyuwa and Zuni elders and how they have helped bridge the methodological ‘gap’ and enrich our research and understanding of rock art.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-655
Number of pages14
JournalWorld Archaeology
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • affect
  • agency
  • American Southwest
  • Australia
  • ethnoarchaeology
  • Rock art

Cite this

@article{84b5c80661ec4cb6a5f85182462acf70,
title = "Sitting in the gap:: Ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness",
abstract = "For close to six decades, ethnoarchaeology has studied the present to better understand the past. However, if understanding the past is paramount, then what of the wishes and interests of those with whom we collaborate in the present? This situation raises questions such as who is ethnoarchaeology for, and how might its outcomes be valuable to both researchers and collaborators? We address these issues by focusing on the space in which researchers operate, namely the ‘gap’ between archaeological and Indigenous conceptualizations of the world, and propose methodological openness to help achieve new ways of thinking about ethnoarchaeology. Drawing on our experiences conducting rock art research in Australia and the American Southwest, we describe the complexities that emerged during conversations with Yanyuwa and Zuni elders and how they have helped bridge the methodological ‘gap’ and enrich our research and understanding of rock art.",
keywords = "affect, agency, American Southwest, Australia, ethnoarchaeology, Rock art",
author = "Brady, {Liam M.} and Amanda Kearney",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/00438243.2016.1193042",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "642--655",
journal = "World Archaeology",
issn = "0043-8243",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Sitting in the gap: Ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness. / Brady, Liam M.; Kearney, Amanda.

In: World Archaeology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2017, p. 642-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sitting in the gap:

T2 - Ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness

AU - Brady, Liam M.

AU - Kearney, Amanda

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - For close to six decades, ethnoarchaeology has studied the present to better understand the past. However, if understanding the past is paramount, then what of the wishes and interests of those with whom we collaborate in the present? This situation raises questions such as who is ethnoarchaeology for, and how might its outcomes be valuable to both researchers and collaborators? We address these issues by focusing on the space in which researchers operate, namely the ‘gap’ between archaeological and Indigenous conceptualizations of the world, and propose methodological openness to help achieve new ways of thinking about ethnoarchaeology. Drawing on our experiences conducting rock art research in Australia and the American Southwest, we describe the complexities that emerged during conversations with Yanyuwa and Zuni elders and how they have helped bridge the methodological ‘gap’ and enrich our research and understanding of rock art.

AB - For close to six decades, ethnoarchaeology has studied the present to better understand the past. However, if understanding the past is paramount, then what of the wishes and interests of those with whom we collaborate in the present? This situation raises questions such as who is ethnoarchaeology for, and how might its outcomes be valuable to both researchers and collaborators? We address these issues by focusing on the space in which researchers operate, namely the ‘gap’ between archaeological and Indigenous conceptualizations of the world, and propose methodological openness to help achieve new ways of thinking about ethnoarchaeology. Drawing on our experiences conducting rock art research in Australia and the American Southwest, we describe the complexities that emerged during conversations with Yanyuwa and Zuni elders and how they have helped bridge the methodological ‘gap’ and enrich our research and understanding of rock art.

KW - affect

KW - agency

KW - American Southwest

KW - Australia

KW - ethnoarchaeology

KW - Rock art

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979073640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00438243.2016.1193042

DO - 10.1080/00438243.2016.1193042

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 642

EP - 655

JO - World Archaeology

JF - World Archaeology

SN - 0043-8243

IS - 5

ER -