Research output per year
Research output per year
Georg Lenz, Eliza Hawkes, Gregor Verhoef, Corinne Haioun, Soon Thye Lim, Dae Seog Heo, Kirit Ardeshna, Geoffrey Chong, Jacob Haaber, Wei Shi, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Susanne Lippert, Florian Hiemeyer, Paolo Piraino, Georg Beckmann, Carol Peña, Viktoriya Buvaylo, Barrett H. Childs, Gilles Salles
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have adverse outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and assessed the relationship between efficacy and DLBCL cell of origin (COO; activated B-cell like [ABC] and germinal center B-cell like [GCB]) and other biomarkers. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in DLBCL COO subgroups (ABC, GCB, and unclassifiable) and by CD79B mutational status (NCT02391116). Sixty-seven patients received copanlisib (ABC DLBCL, n = 19; GCB DLBCL, n = 30; unclassifiable, n = 3; missing, n = 15). The ORR was 19.4%; 31.6% and 13.3% in ABC and GCB DLBCL patients, respectively. ORR was 22.2%/20.0% for patients with/without CD79B mutations (wild type, n = 45; mutant, n = 9; missing, n = 13). Overall median progression-free survival and duration of response were 1.8 and 4.3 months, respectively. Adverse events included hypertension (40.3%), diarrhea (37.3%), and hyperglycemia (32.8%). Aberrations were detected in 338 genes, including BCL2 (53.7%) and MLL2 (53.7%). A 16-gene signature separating responders from nonresponders was identified. Copanlisib treatment demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and a numerically higher response rate in ABC vs. GCB DLBCL patients.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2184-2197 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Leukemia |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2020 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review