Signage as a tool for behavioral change

Direct and indirect routes to understanding the meaning of a sign

Julia Meis, Yoshihisa Kashima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Signs, prompts, and symbols are a common means to change behavior in our society. Understanding the psychological mechanisms by which signage influences behavior is a critical first step to achieve the desired outcome. In the current research, we propose a theoretical model of sign-to-behavior process. The model suggests that when one encounters a sign, it is encoded to construct an action representation (comprehension process), which is then acted on unless its enactment is inhibited (decision process). We test the implications of the model in two studies. In support of our hypothesis, for unfamiliar signs, clarity of purpose predicts perceived effectiveness of a sign; however, for familiar signs, clarity of purpose does not matter. Insights gained from the studies will help to design effective signs. Practical implications of the model are discussed, and future research directions are outlined.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0182975
Number of pages16
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{7889f5639abd45eda44949e2e165da1b,
title = "Signage as a tool for behavioral change: Direct and indirect routes to understanding the meaning of a sign",
abstract = "Signs, prompts, and symbols are a common means to change behavior in our society. Understanding the psychological mechanisms by which signage influences behavior is a critical first step to achieve the desired outcome. In the current research, we propose a theoretical model of sign-to-behavior process. The model suggests that when one encounters a sign, it is encoded to construct an action representation (comprehension process), which is then acted on unless its enactment is inhibited (decision process). We test the implications of the model in two studies. In support of our hypothesis, for unfamiliar signs, clarity of purpose predicts perceived effectiveness of a sign; however, for familiar signs, clarity of purpose does not matter. Insights gained from the studies will help to design effective signs. Practical implications of the model are discussed, and future research directions are outlined.",
author = "Julia Meis and Yoshihisa Kashima",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0182975",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

Signage as a tool for behavioral change : Direct and indirect routes to understanding the meaning of a sign. / Meis, Julia; Kashima, Yoshihisa.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 8, e0182975, 30.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signage as a tool for behavioral change

T2 - Direct and indirect routes to understanding the meaning of a sign

AU - Meis, Julia

AU - Kashima, Yoshihisa

PY - 2017/8/30

Y1 - 2017/8/30

N2 - Signs, prompts, and symbols are a common means to change behavior in our society. Understanding the psychological mechanisms by which signage influences behavior is a critical first step to achieve the desired outcome. In the current research, we propose a theoretical model of sign-to-behavior process. The model suggests that when one encounters a sign, it is encoded to construct an action representation (comprehension process), which is then acted on unless its enactment is inhibited (decision process). We test the implications of the model in two studies. In support of our hypothesis, for unfamiliar signs, clarity of purpose predicts perceived effectiveness of a sign; however, for familiar signs, clarity of purpose does not matter. Insights gained from the studies will help to design effective signs. Practical implications of the model are discussed, and future research directions are outlined.

AB - Signs, prompts, and symbols are a common means to change behavior in our society. Understanding the psychological mechanisms by which signage influences behavior is a critical first step to achieve the desired outcome. In the current research, we propose a theoretical model of sign-to-behavior process. The model suggests that when one encounters a sign, it is encoded to construct an action representation (comprehension process), which is then acted on unless its enactment is inhibited (decision process). We test the implications of the model in two studies. In support of our hypothesis, for unfamiliar signs, clarity of purpose predicts perceived effectiveness of a sign; however, for familiar signs, clarity of purpose does not matter. Insights gained from the studies will help to design effective signs. Practical implications of the model are discussed, and future research directions are outlined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029044676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0182975

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0182975

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e0182975

ER -