Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?

Euzebiusz Jamrozik; Michael J. Selgelid

doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106900

Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?

Euzebiusz Jamrozik
, Michael J. Selgelid

Monash Bioethics Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Other › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	835-836
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Medical Ethics
Volume	46
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106900
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

clinical trials
ethics
public health ethics
research ethics

Access to Document

10.1136/medethics-2020-106900Licence: CC BY

325810722-oaFinal published version, 168 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{81316b957b614b89a983201512062906,

title = "Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?",

keywords = "clinical trials, ethics, public health ethics, research ethics",

author = "Euzebiusz Jamrozik and Selgelid, \{Michael J.\}",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1136/medethics-2020-106900",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "835--836",

journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",

issn = "0306-6800",