Sex differences in the association between socioeconomic status and diabetes prevalence and incidence in China: cross-sectional and prospective studies of 0.5 million adults

Hongjiang Wu, Fiona Bragg, Ling Yang, Huaidong Du, Yu Guo, Caroline A. Jackson, Shankuan Zhu, Canqing Yu, Andrea O.Y. Luk, Juliana C.N. Chan, Danijela Gasevic, Liming Li, Zhengming Chen, Sarah H. Wild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: China has undergone rapid socioeconomic transition accompanied by lifestyle changes that are expected to have a profound impact on the health of its population. However, there is limited evidence from large nationwide studies about the relevance of socioeconomic status (SES) to risk of diabetes. We describe the associations of two key measures of SES with prevalent and incident diabetes in Chinese men and women. Methods: The China Kadoorie Biobank study included 0.5 million adults aged 30–79 years recruited from ten diverse areas in China during 2004–2008. SES was assessed using the highest educational level attained and annual household income. Prevalent diabetes was identified from self-report and plasma glucose measurements. Incident diabetes was identified from linkage to disease and death registries and national health insurance claim databases. We estimated adjusted ORs and HRs for prevalent and incident diabetes associated with SES using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. Results: At baseline, 30,066 (5.9%) participants had previously diagnosed (3.1%) or screen-detected (2.8%) diabetes among 510,219 participants included for cross-sectional analyses. There were 480,153 people without prevalent diabetes at baseline, of whom 9544 (2.0%) had new-onset diabetes during follow-up (median 7 years). Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for prevalent diabetes, comparing highest vs lowest educational level, were 1.21 (1.09, 1.35) in men and 0.69 (0.63, 0.76) in women; for incident diabetes, the corresponding HRs were 1.27 (1.07, 1.51) and 0.80 (0.67, 0.95), respectively. For household income, the adjusted ORs for prevalent diabetes, comparing highest vs lowest categories, were 1.45 (1.34, 1.56) in men and 1.26 (1.19, 1.34) in women; for incident diabetes, the HRs were 1.36 (1.19, 1.55) and 1.06 (0.95, 1.17), respectively. Conclusions/interpretation: Among Chinese adults, the associations between education and diabetes prevalence and incidence differed qualitatively between men and women, whereas higher household income was positively associated with diabetes prevalence and incidence in both sexes, with a stronger relationship in men than in women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1420-1429
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetologia
Volume62
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Educational level
  • Health inequality
  • Household income
  • Socioeconomic status

Cite this