Sex differences in mouse models of fear inhibition: Fear extinction, safety learning, and fear–safety discrimination

Jacob W. Clark, Sean P.A. Drummond, Daniel Hoyer, Laura H. Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Women are overrepresented in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental disorder characterised by ineffective inhibition of fear. The use of male animals dominates preclinical studies, which may contribute to a lack of understanding as to why this disparity exists. Thus, the current study explores sex differences in three mouse models of fear inhibition. Experimental Approach: All experiments tested male and female C57Bl/6J mice. Experiment 1 employed two fear conditioning protocols, in which tones were paired with footshocks of differing intensity (moderate or intense). Fear recall and extinction were tested subsequently. In Experiment 2, safety learning was investigated. Tones were explicitly unpaired with footshocks during safety conditioning. Recall of safety learning was tested 24 hr later. Experiment 3 assessed a model of fear–safety discrimination. Cued stimuli were paired or never paired with footshocks during fear and safety conditioning, respectively. Discrimination between stimuli was assessed 24 hr later. Key Results: In fear extinction, males, compared to females, responded with greater fear in sessions most proximal to conditioning but subsequently showed a more rapid fear extinction over time. Sex differences were not observed during safety learning. During fear–safety discrimination, both males and females discriminated between stimuli; however, males revealed a greater level of freezing to stimuli. Conclusion and Implications: The current study provides evidence that sex differences influence fear but not safety-based behaviour in C57Bl/6J mice. These findings indicate that processing of fear, but not safety, may play a greater role in sex differences observed for PTSD.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Pharmacology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2 Feb 2019

Cite this

@article{4d0c9d8126be4d8cbbda84ef71e84bac,
title = "Sex differences in mouse models of fear inhibition: Fear extinction, safety learning, and fear–safety discrimination",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Women are overrepresented in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental disorder characterised by ineffective inhibition of fear. The use of male animals dominates preclinical studies, which may contribute to a lack of understanding as to why this disparity exists. Thus, the current study explores sex differences in three mouse models of fear inhibition. Experimental Approach: All experiments tested male and female C57Bl/6J mice. Experiment 1 employed two fear conditioning protocols, in which tones were paired with footshocks of differing intensity (moderate or intense). Fear recall and extinction were tested subsequently. In Experiment 2, safety learning was investigated. Tones were explicitly unpaired with footshocks during safety conditioning. Recall of safety learning was tested 24 hr later. Experiment 3 assessed a model of fear–safety discrimination. Cued stimuli were paired or never paired with footshocks during fear and safety conditioning, respectively. Discrimination between stimuli was assessed 24 hr later. Key Results: In fear extinction, males, compared to females, responded with greater fear in sessions most proximal to conditioning but subsequently showed a more rapid fear extinction over time. Sex differences were not observed during safety learning. During fear–safety discrimination, both males and females discriminated between stimuli; however, males revealed a greater level of freezing to stimuli. Conclusion and Implications: The current study provides evidence that sex differences influence fear but not safety-based behaviour in C57Bl/6J mice. These findings indicate that processing of fear, but not safety, may play a greater role in sex differences observed for PTSD.",
author = "Clark, {Jacob W.} and Drummond, {Sean P.A.} and Daniel Hoyer and Jacobson, {Laura H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1111/bph.14600",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Pharmacology",
issn = "1476-5381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Sex differences in mouse models of fear inhibition : Fear extinction, safety learning, and fear–safety discrimination. / Clark, Jacob W.; Drummond, Sean P.A.; Hoyer, Daniel; Jacobson, Laura H.

In: British Journal of Pharmacology, 02.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in mouse models of fear inhibition

T2 - Fear extinction, safety learning, and fear–safety discrimination

AU - Clark, Jacob W.

AU - Drummond, Sean P.A.

AU - Hoyer, Daniel

AU - Jacobson, Laura H.

PY - 2019/2/2

Y1 - 2019/2/2

N2 - Background and Purpose: Women are overrepresented in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental disorder characterised by ineffective inhibition of fear. The use of male animals dominates preclinical studies, which may contribute to a lack of understanding as to why this disparity exists. Thus, the current study explores sex differences in three mouse models of fear inhibition. Experimental Approach: All experiments tested male and female C57Bl/6J mice. Experiment 1 employed two fear conditioning protocols, in which tones were paired with footshocks of differing intensity (moderate or intense). Fear recall and extinction were tested subsequently. In Experiment 2, safety learning was investigated. Tones were explicitly unpaired with footshocks during safety conditioning. Recall of safety learning was tested 24 hr later. Experiment 3 assessed a model of fear–safety discrimination. Cued stimuli were paired or never paired with footshocks during fear and safety conditioning, respectively. Discrimination between stimuli was assessed 24 hr later. Key Results: In fear extinction, males, compared to females, responded with greater fear in sessions most proximal to conditioning but subsequently showed a more rapid fear extinction over time. Sex differences were not observed during safety learning. During fear–safety discrimination, both males and females discriminated between stimuli; however, males revealed a greater level of freezing to stimuli. Conclusion and Implications: The current study provides evidence that sex differences influence fear but not safety-based behaviour in C57Bl/6J mice. These findings indicate that processing of fear, but not safety, may play a greater role in sex differences observed for PTSD.

AB - Background and Purpose: Women are overrepresented in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental disorder characterised by ineffective inhibition of fear. The use of male animals dominates preclinical studies, which may contribute to a lack of understanding as to why this disparity exists. Thus, the current study explores sex differences in three mouse models of fear inhibition. Experimental Approach: All experiments tested male and female C57Bl/6J mice. Experiment 1 employed two fear conditioning protocols, in which tones were paired with footshocks of differing intensity (moderate or intense). Fear recall and extinction were tested subsequently. In Experiment 2, safety learning was investigated. Tones were explicitly unpaired with footshocks during safety conditioning. Recall of safety learning was tested 24 hr later. Experiment 3 assessed a model of fear–safety discrimination. Cued stimuli were paired or never paired with footshocks during fear and safety conditioning, respectively. Discrimination between stimuli was assessed 24 hr later. Key Results: In fear extinction, males, compared to females, responded with greater fear in sessions most proximal to conditioning but subsequently showed a more rapid fear extinction over time. Sex differences were not observed during safety learning. During fear–safety discrimination, both males and females discriminated between stimuli; however, males revealed a greater level of freezing to stimuli. Conclusion and Implications: The current study provides evidence that sex differences influence fear but not safety-based behaviour in C57Bl/6J mice. These findings indicate that processing of fear, but not safety, may play a greater role in sex differences observed for PTSD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064564998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bph.14600

DO - 10.1111/bph.14600

M3 - Article

JO - British Journal of Pharmacology

JF - British Journal of Pharmacology

SN - 1476-5381

ER -