Sex differences in local adaptation

what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Erik Svensson, Deborah Goedert, Miguel Gomez-Llano, Foteini Spagopoulou, Angela Nava-Bolanos, Isobel Booksmythe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Local adaptation is of fundamental interest to evolutionary biologists. Traditionally, local adaptation has been studied using reciprocal transplant experiments to quantify fitness differences between residents and immigrants in pairwise transplants between study populations. Previous studies have detected local adaptation in some cases, but others have shown lack of adaptation or even maladaptation. Recently, the importance of different fitness components, such as survival and fecundity, to local adaptation have been emphasized. Here, we address another neglected aspect in studies of local adaptation: sex differences. Given the ubiquity of sexual dimorphism in life histories and phenotypic traits, this neglect is surprising, but may be partly explained by differences in research traditions and terminology in the fields of local adaptation and sexual selection. Studies that investigate differences in mating success between resident and immigrants across populations tend to be framed in terms of reproductive and behavioural isolation, rather than local adaptation. We briefly review the published literature that bridges these areas and suggest that reciprocal transplant experiments could benefit from quantifying both male and female fitness components. Such a more integrative research approach could clarify the role of sex differences in the evolution of local adaptations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20170420
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume373
Issue number1757
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • female demographic dominance
  • gene flow
  • intersexual genetic correlation
  • local adaptation
  • reciprocal transplant experiments
  • sexual dimorphism

Cite this

Svensson, Erik ; Goedert, Deborah ; Gomez-Llano, Miguel ; Spagopoulou, Foteini ; Nava-Bolanos, Angela ; Booksmythe, Isobel. / Sex differences in local adaptation : what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018 ; Vol. 373, No. 1757.
@article{e799c6e76f244e1baf1917592ed98255,
title = "Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?",
abstract = "Local adaptation is of fundamental interest to evolutionary biologists. Traditionally, local adaptation has been studied using reciprocal transplant experiments to quantify fitness differences between residents and immigrants in pairwise transplants between study populations. Previous studies have detected local adaptation in some cases, but others have shown lack of adaptation or even maladaptation. Recently, the importance of different fitness components, such as survival and fecundity, to local adaptation have been emphasized. Here, we address another neglected aspect in studies of local adaptation: sex differences. Given the ubiquity of sexual dimorphism in life histories and phenotypic traits, this neglect is surprising, but may be partly explained by differences in research traditions and terminology in the fields of local adaptation and sexual selection. Studies that investigate differences in mating success between resident and immigrants across populations tend to be framed in terms of reproductive and behavioural isolation, rather than local adaptation. We briefly review the published literature that bridges these areas and suggest that reciprocal transplant experiments could benefit from quantifying both male and female fitness components. Such a more integrative research approach could clarify the role of sex differences in the evolution of local adaptations.",
keywords = "female demographic dominance, gene flow, intersexual genetic correlation, local adaptation, reciprocal transplant experiments, sexual dimorphism",
author = "Erik Svensson and Deborah Goedert and Miguel Gomez-Llano and Foteini Spagopoulou and Angela Nava-Bolanos and Isobel Booksmythe",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2017.0420",
language = "English",
volume = "373",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "The Royal Society Publishing",
number = "1757",

}

Sex differences in local adaptation : what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments? / Svensson, Erik; Goedert, Deborah; Gomez-Llano, Miguel; Spagopoulou, Foteini; Nava-Bolanos, Angela; Booksmythe, Isobel.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 373, No. 1757, 20170420, 27.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in local adaptation

T2 - what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

AU - Svensson, Erik

AU - Goedert, Deborah

AU - Gomez-Llano, Miguel

AU - Spagopoulou, Foteini

AU - Nava-Bolanos, Angela

AU - Booksmythe, Isobel

PY - 2018/8/27

Y1 - 2018/8/27

N2 - Local adaptation is of fundamental interest to evolutionary biologists. Traditionally, local adaptation has been studied using reciprocal transplant experiments to quantify fitness differences between residents and immigrants in pairwise transplants between study populations. Previous studies have detected local adaptation in some cases, but others have shown lack of adaptation or even maladaptation. Recently, the importance of different fitness components, such as survival and fecundity, to local adaptation have been emphasized. Here, we address another neglected aspect in studies of local adaptation: sex differences. Given the ubiquity of sexual dimorphism in life histories and phenotypic traits, this neglect is surprising, but may be partly explained by differences in research traditions and terminology in the fields of local adaptation and sexual selection. Studies that investigate differences in mating success between resident and immigrants across populations tend to be framed in terms of reproductive and behavioural isolation, rather than local adaptation. We briefly review the published literature that bridges these areas and suggest that reciprocal transplant experiments could benefit from quantifying both male and female fitness components. Such a more integrative research approach could clarify the role of sex differences in the evolution of local adaptations.

AB - Local adaptation is of fundamental interest to evolutionary biologists. Traditionally, local adaptation has been studied using reciprocal transplant experiments to quantify fitness differences between residents and immigrants in pairwise transplants between study populations. Previous studies have detected local adaptation in some cases, but others have shown lack of adaptation or even maladaptation. Recently, the importance of different fitness components, such as survival and fecundity, to local adaptation have been emphasized. Here, we address another neglected aspect in studies of local adaptation: sex differences. Given the ubiquity of sexual dimorphism in life histories and phenotypic traits, this neglect is surprising, but may be partly explained by differences in research traditions and terminology in the fields of local adaptation and sexual selection. Studies that investigate differences in mating success between resident and immigrants across populations tend to be framed in terms of reproductive and behavioural isolation, rather than local adaptation. We briefly review the published literature that bridges these areas and suggest that reciprocal transplant experiments could benefit from quantifying both male and female fitness components. Such a more integrative research approach could clarify the role of sex differences in the evolution of local adaptations.

KW - female demographic dominance

KW - gene flow

KW - intersexual genetic correlation

KW - local adaptation

KW - reciprocal transplant experiments

KW - sexual dimorphism

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2017.0420

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2017.0420

M3 - Review Article

VL - 373

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1757

M1 - 20170420

ER -