Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk

Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Subjects in a laboratory experiment completed the Zuckerman Sensation-Seeking Scale (SSS) then chose among five alternative gambles with substantial financial stakes. The gambles differed in expected return and variance. Gambles were presented in one of two different frames in a between-subjects design. In one, subjects were paid a fixed sum for completing the survey and that sum was then at risk in the subsequent gamble choices. In the other, all payoff amounts for the gambles were nonnegative. Subjects were paid according to their choices and the outcomes of the gambles. We tested for sex differences in this choice task and found women to be consistently more risk averse, on average, than men. We observed no difference across frames. Subjects were then asked to guess the gamble choices of each of the other participants and were rewarded for each correct answer. Subjects of both sexes did substantially better than chance in guessing the particular choices of individuals of both sexes, but both men and women overestimated the risk aversion of others, especially that of women, and most strongly of all with respect to men's predictions of women's choices. Possible real-world implications of biased assumptions about women's risk attitudes are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-295
Number of pages15
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2002

Keywords

  • Gambles
  • Risk
  • Sensation-seeking
  • Sex differences
  • Stereotyping

Cite this

@article{6fbe645f8e2344c780b91a3b685103ef,
title = "Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk",
abstract = "Subjects in a laboratory experiment completed the Zuckerman Sensation-Seeking Scale (SSS) then chose among five alternative gambles with substantial financial stakes. The gambles differed in expected return and variance. Gambles were presented in one of two different frames in a between-subjects design. In one, subjects were paid a fixed sum for completing the survey and that sum was then at risk in the subsequent gamble choices. In the other, all payoff amounts for the gambles were nonnegative. Subjects were paid according to their choices and the outcomes of the gambles. We tested for sex differences in this choice task and found women to be consistently more risk averse, on average, than men. We observed no difference across frames. Subjects were then asked to guess the gamble choices of each of the other participants and were rewarded for each correct answer. Subjects of both sexes did substantially better than chance in guessing the particular choices of individuals of both sexes, but both men and women overestimated the risk aversion of others, especially that of women, and most strongly of all with respect to men's predictions of women's choices. Possible real-world implications of biased assumptions about women's risk attitudes are discussed.",
keywords = "Gambles, Risk, Sensation-seeking, Sex differences, Stereotyping",
author = "Eckel, {Catherine C.} and Grossman, {Philip J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "281--295",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. / Eckel, Catherine C.; Grossman, Philip J.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 4, 10.07.2002, p. 281-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk

AU - Eckel, Catherine C.

AU - Grossman, Philip J.

PY - 2002/7/10

Y1 - 2002/7/10

N2 - Subjects in a laboratory experiment completed the Zuckerman Sensation-Seeking Scale (SSS) then chose among five alternative gambles with substantial financial stakes. The gambles differed in expected return and variance. Gambles were presented in one of two different frames in a between-subjects design. In one, subjects were paid a fixed sum for completing the survey and that sum was then at risk in the subsequent gamble choices. In the other, all payoff amounts for the gambles were nonnegative. Subjects were paid according to their choices and the outcomes of the gambles. We tested for sex differences in this choice task and found women to be consistently more risk averse, on average, than men. We observed no difference across frames. Subjects were then asked to guess the gamble choices of each of the other participants and were rewarded for each correct answer. Subjects of both sexes did substantially better than chance in guessing the particular choices of individuals of both sexes, but both men and women overestimated the risk aversion of others, especially that of women, and most strongly of all with respect to men's predictions of women's choices. Possible real-world implications of biased assumptions about women's risk attitudes are discussed.

AB - Subjects in a laboratory experiment completed the Zuckerman Sensation-Seeking Scale (SSS) then chose among five alternative gambles with substantial financial stakes. The gambles differed in expected return and variance. Gambles were presented in one of two different frames in a between-subjects design. In one, subjects were paid a fixed sum for completing the survey and that sum was then at risk in the subsequent gamble choices. In the other, all payoff amounts for the gambles were nonnegative. Subjects were paid according to their choices and the outcomes of the gambles. We tested for sex differences in this choice task and found women to be consistently more risk averse, on average, than men. We observed no difference across frames. Subjects were then asked to guess the gamble choices of each of the other participants and were rewarded for each correct answer. Subjects of both sexes did substantially better than chance in guessing the particular choices of individuals of both sexes, but both men and women overestimated the risk aversion of others, especially that of women, and most strongly of all with respect to men's predictions of women's choices. Possible real-world implications of biased assumptions about women's risk attitudes are discussed.

KW - Gambles

KW - Risk

KW - Sensation-seeking

KW - Sex differences

KW - Stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036293460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1

DO - 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 281

EP - 295

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

IS - 4

ER -