TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures
T2 - a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
AU - Biswas, A.
AU - Harbin, S.
AU - Irvin, E.
AU - Johnston, H.
AU - Begum, M.
AU - Tiong, M.
AU - Apedaile, D.
AU - Koehoorn, M.
AU - Smith, P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the help received from Joanna Liu from the Institute for Work & Health on all library-related matters and Zoe Sinkins for screening for eligibility. As well, we would like to thank the translators who provided assistance with reviewing studies in languages not spoken by members of the review team: Joanna Liu, Albana Canga, Paolo Maselli, Hyunmi Lee, Kathy Padkapayeva, Amir Mofidi, Cynthia Chen, Qing Liao, Basak Yanar, Morgane Le Pouesard, Amani Massoud; Erika Ota, Rina Shoki, Anna Kono, Joanna Zaj?c, Carly Coelho, Liliya Ziganshina, Cholpon Tashtanbekova, Jiajie Yu, Ke Deng, Jordi Pardo Pardo, and Areti Angeliki Veroniki.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Purpose of Review: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. Recent Findings: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. Summary: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation.
AB - Purpose of Review: Comparative research on sex and/or gender differences in occupational hazard exposures is necessary for effective work injury and illness prevention strategies. This scoping review summarizes the peer-reviewed literature from 2009 to 2019 on exposure differences to occupational hazards between men and women, across occupations, and within the same occupation. Recent Findings: Fifty-eight studies retrieved from eight databases met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies were found on physical hazards, 38 studies on psychological/psychosocial hazards, 5 studies on biological hazards, and 17 studies on chemical hazards. The majority of studies reported that men were exposed to noise, vibration, medical radiation, physically demanding work, solar radiation, falls, biomechanical risks, chemical hazards, and blood contamination; while women were exposed to wet work, bullying and discrimination, work stress, and biological agents. Within the same occupations, men were more likely to be exposed to physical hazards, with the exception of women in health care occupations and exposure to prolonged standing. Women compared to men in the same occupations were more likely to experience harassment, while men compared to women in the same occupations reported higher work stress. Men reported more exposure to hazardous chemicals in the same occupations as women. Summary: The review suggests that men and women have different exposures to occupational hazards and that these differences are not solely due to a gendered distribution of the labor force by occupation. Findings may inform prevention efforts seeking to reduce gender inequalities in occupational health. Future research is needed to explain the reasons for sex/gender inequality differences in exposures within the same occupation.
KW - Gender-based analysis
KW - Occupational health
KW - Safety
KW - Scoping review
KW - Sex differences
KW - Workers
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85120071380
U2 - 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8
DO - 10.1007/s40572-021-00330-8
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 34839446
AN - SCOPUS:85120071380
SN - 2196-5412
VL - 8
SP - 267
EP - 280
JO - Current Environmental Health Reports
JF - Current Environmental Health Reports
IS - 4
ER -