Seven deaths in Darwin

Case studies under the rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia

David W. Kissane, Annette Street, Philip Nitschke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background. During the 9 months between July, 1996, and March, 1997, the provision of euthanasia for the terminally ill was legal in the Northern Territory of Australia. Seven patients made formal use of the Rights of the Terminally Ill (ROTI) Act;1 four died under the Act. We report their clinical details and the decision-making process required by the Act. Methods. We taped in-depth interviews with the general practitioner who provided euthanasia. Further information was available from public texts created by patients, the media, and the coroner. Findings. All seven patients had cancer, most at advanced stages. Three were socially isolated. Symptoms of depression were common. Having met criteria of the Act, some patients deferred their decision for a time before proceeding with euthanasia. Medical opinions about the terminal nature of illness differed. Interpretation. Provision of opinions about the terminal nature of illness and the mental health of the patient, as required by the ROTI Act, created problematic gatekeeping roles for the doctors involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1097-1102
Number of pages6
JournalLancet
Volume352
Issue number9134
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 1998

Cite this

Kissane, David W. ; Street, Annette ; Nitschke, Philip. / Seven deaths in Darwin : Case studies under the rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia. In: Lancet. 1998 ; Vol. 352, No. 9134. pp. 1097-1102.
@article{822bb20d55484569a069731e0d9926ae,
title = "Seven deaths in Darwin: Case studies under the rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia",
abstract = "Background. During the 9 months between July, 1996, and March, 1997, the provision of euthanasia for the terminally ill was legal in the Northern Territory of Australia. Seven patients made formal use of the Rights of the Terminally Ill (ROTI) Act;1 four died under the Act. We report their clinical details and the decision-making process required by the Act. Methods. We taped in-depth interviews with the general practitioner who provided euthanasia. Further information was available from public texts created by patients, the media, and the coroner. Findings. All seven patients had cancer, most at advanced stages. Three were socially isolated. Symptoms of depression were common. Having met criteria of the Act, some patients deferred their decision for a time before proceeding with euthanasia. Medical opinions about the terminal nature of illness differed. Interpretation. Provision of opinions about the terminal nature of illness and the mental health of the patient, as required by the ROTI Act, created problematic gatekeeping roles for the doctors involved.",
author = "Kissane, {David W.} and Annette Street and Philip Nitschke",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05406-3",
language = "English",
volume = "352",
pages = "1097--1102",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9134",

}

Seven deaths in Darwin : Case studies under the rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia. / Kissane, David W.; Street, Annette; Nitschke, Philip.

In: Lancet, Vol. 352, No. 9134, 03.10.1998, p. 1097-1102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seven deaths in Darwin

T2 - Case studies under the rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia

AU - Kissane, David W.

AU - Street, Annette

AU - Nitschke, Philip

PY - 1998/10/3

Y1 - 1998/10/3

N2 - Background. During the 9 months between July, 1996, and March, 1997, the provision of euthanasia for the terminally ill was legal in the Northern Territory of Australia. Seven patients made formal use of the Rights of the Terminally Ill (ROTI) Act;1 four died under the Act. We report their clinical details and the decision-making process required by the Act. Methods. We taped in-depth interviews with the general practitioner who provided euthanasia. Further information was available from public texts created by patients, the media, and the coroner. Findings. All seven patients had cancer, most at advanced stages. Three were socially isolated. Symptoms of depression were common. Having met criteria of the Act, some patients deferred their decision for a time before proceeding with euthanasia. Medical opinions about the terminal nature of illness differed. Interpretation. Provision of opinions about the terminal nature of illness and the mental health of the patient, as required by the ROTI Act, created problematic gatekeeping roles for the doctors involved.

AB - Background. During the 9 months between July, 1996, and March, 1997, the provision of euthanasia for the terminally ill was legal in the Northern Territory of Australia. Seven patients made formal use of the Rights of the Terminally Ill (ROTI) Act;1 four died under the Act. We report their clinical details and the decision-making process required by the Act. Methods. We taped in-depth interviews with the general practitioner who provided euthanasia. Further information was available from public texts created by patients, the media, and the coroner. Findings. All seven patients had cancer, most at advanced stages. Three were socially isolated. Symptoms of depression were common. Having met criteria of the Act, some patients deferred their decision for a time before proceeding with euthanasia. Medical opinions about the terminal nature of illness differed. Interpretation. Provision of opinions about the terminal nature of illness and the mental health of the patient, as required by the ROTI Act, created problematic gatekeeping roles for the doctors involved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032480545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05406-3

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05406-3

M3 - Article

VL - 352

SP - 1097

EP - 1102

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9134

ER -