TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting research priorities for effective management of a threatened ecosystem
T2 - Australian alpine and subalpine peatland
AU - Rowland, Jessica A.
AU - Walsh, Jessica C.
AU - Beitzel, Matthew
AU - Brawata, Renee
AU - Brown, Daniel
AU - Chalmers, Linden
AU - Evans, Lisa
AU - Eyles, Kathryn
AU - Gibbs, Rob
AU - Grover, Samantha
AU - Grundy, Shane
AU - Harris, Rebecca M.B.
AU - Haywood, Shayne
AU - Hilton, Mairi
AU - Hope, Geoffrey
AU - Keaney, Ben
AU - Keatley, Marie
AU - Keith, David A.
AU - Lawrence, Ruth
AU - Lutz, Maiko L.
AU - MacDonald, Trish
AU - MacPhee, Elizabeth
AU - McLean, Nina
AU - Powell, Susan
AU - Robledo-Ruiz, Diana A.
AU - Sato, Chloe F.
AU - Schroder, Mel
AU - Silvester, Ewen
AU - Tolsma, Arn
AU - Western, Andrew W.
AU - Whinam, Jennie
AU - White, Matthew
AU - Wild, Anita
AU - Williams, Richard J.
AU - Wright, Genevieve
AU - Young, Wade
AU - Moore, Joslin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all participants for their time and valuable contributions. This project was funded by the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Parks Victoria, and Monash University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Threatened ecosystem conservation requires an understanding of the effectiveness of management and the challenges hindering successful protection and recovery. Bringing together researchers, land managers and policymakers to identify key threats, management needs, and knowledge gaps provides a unified account of the evidence and tools needed to improve threatened ecosystem management. We undertook a research prioritization process for Australian alpine and subalpine peatlands with experts across policy, research, and management. Through individual interviews, structured group discussions, and voting, we generated 25 priority research questions that, if addressed, would enhance our capacity to conserve peatlands. Knowledge gaps spanned four topics: understanding peatland dynamics, impacts of threats, methods to manage these, and the effectiveness of management. Consistent monitoring standards, an open-access knowledge platform and commitment to long-term joint research and management were identified as vital. This collaboration enabled development of a shared agenda of research priorities to target knowledge gaps for informing policy and management of threatened alpine peatlands. Our findings substantiate the importance of stronger ongoing collaboration among researchers, land managers and policymakers across jurisdictions to support conservation.
AB - Threatened ecosystem conservation requires an understanding of the effectiveness of management and the challenges hindering successful protection and recovery. Bringing together researchers, land managers and policymakers to identify key threats, management needs, and knowledge gaps provides a unified account of the evidence and tools needed to improve threatened ecosystem management. We undertook a research prioritization process for Australian alpine and subalpine peatlands with experts across policy, research, and management. Through individual interviews, structured group discussions, and voting, we generated 25 priority research questions that, if addressed, would enhance our capacity to conserve peatlands. Knowledge gaps spanned four topics: understanding peatland dynamics, impacts of threats, methods to manage these, and the effectiveness of management. Consistent monitoring standards, an open-access knowledge platform and commitment to long-term joint research and management were identified as vital. This collaboration enabled development of a shared agenda of research priorities to target knowledge gaps for informing policy and management of threatened alpine peatlands. Our findings substantiate the importance of stronger ongoing collaboration among researchers, land managers and policymakers across jurisdictions to support conservation.
KW - alpine peatlands
KW - bog
KW - conservation management
KW - ecosystem recovery
KW - fen
KW - horizon scan
KW - research prioritization
KW - restoration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147335512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/csp2.12891
DO - 10.1111/csp2.12891
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147335512
SN - 2578-4854
VL - 5
JO - Conservation Science and Practice
JF - Conservation Science and Practice
IS - 3
M1 - e12891
ER -