TY - JOUR
T1 - Semi-supervised labelling of the femur in a whole-body post-mortem CT database using deep learning
AU - Peña-Solórzano, C. A.
AU - Albrecht, D. W.
AU - Bassed, R. B.
AU - Gillam, J.
AU - Harris, P. C.
AU - Dimmock, M. R.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - A deep learning pipeline was developed and used to localize and classify a variety of implants in the femur contained in whole-body post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) scans. The results provide a proof-of-principle approach for labelling content not described in medical/autopsy reports. The pipeline, which incorporated residual networks and an autoencoder, was trained and tested using n = 450 full-body PMCT scans. For the localization component, Dice scores of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98 and mean absolute errors of 3.2, 7.1, and 4.2 mm were obtained in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views, respectively. A regression analysis found the orientation of the implant to the scanner axis and also the relative positioning of extremities to be statistically significant factors. For the classification component, test cases were properly labelled as nail (N+), hip replacement (H+), knee replacement (K+) or without-implant (I−) with an accuracy >97%. The recall for I− and H+ cases was 1.00, but fell to 0.82 and 0.65 for cases with K+ and N+. This semi-automatic approach provides a generalized structure for image-based labelling of features, without requiring time-consuming segmentation.
AB - A deep learning pipeline was developed and used to localize and classify a variety of implants in the femur contained in whole-body post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) scans. The results provide a proof-of-principle approach for labelling content not described in medical/autopsy reports. The pipeline, which incorporated residual networks and an autoencoder, was trained and tested using n = 450 full-body PMCT scans. For the localization component, Dice scores of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98 and mean absolute errors of 3.2, 7.1, and 4.2 mm were obtained in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views, respectively. A regression analysis found the orientation of the implant to the scanner axis and also the relative positioning of extremities to be statistically significant factors. For the classification component, test cases were properly labelled as nail (N+), hip replacement (H+), knee replacement (K+) or without-implant (I−) with an accuracy >97%. The recall for I− and H+ cases was 1.00, but fell to 0.82 and 0.65 for cases with K+ and N+. This semi-automatic approach provides a generalized structure for image-based labelling of features, without requiring time-consuming segmentation.
KW - Autoencoder
KW - CT
KW - Deep learning
KW - Femoral head representation
KW - Femur localization
KW - Forensic
KW - Knee representation
KW - Machine learning
KW - Post-mortem
KW - Semi-supervised
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085739020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103797
DO - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103797
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085739020
SN - 0010-4825
VL - 122
JO - Computers in Biology and Medicine
JF - Computers in Biology and Medicine
M1 - 103797
ER -