Scientific evidence is just the starting point

A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions

Alexander Donaldson, David G Lloyd, Belinda Jane Gabbe, Jillianne Leigh Cook, Warren Young, Peta White, Caroline Frances Finch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The 2 most cited sports injury prevention research frameworks incorporate intervention development, yet little guidance is available in the sports science literature on how to undertake this complex process. This paper presents a generalizable process for developing implementable sports injury prevention interventions, including a case study applying the process to develop a lower limb injury prevention exercise training program (FootyFirst) for community Australian football.

Methods: The intervention development process is underpinned by 2 complementary premises: (1) that evidence-based practice integrates the best available scientific evidence with practitioner expertise and end-user values and (2) that research evidence alone is insufficient to develop implementable interventions.

Results: The generalizable 6-step intervention development process involves (1) compiling research evidence, clinical experience, and knowledge of the implementation context; (2) consulting with experts; (3) engaging with end users; (4) testing the intervention; (5) using theory; and (6) obtaining feedback from early implementers. Following each step, intervention content and presentation should be revised to ensure that the final intervention includes evidence-informed content that is likely to be adopted, properly implemented, and sustained over time by the targeted intervention deliverers. For FootyFirst, this process involved establishing a multidisciplinary intervention development group, conducting 2 targeted literature reviews, undertaking an online expert consensus process, conducting focus groups with program end users, testing the program multiple times in different contexts, and obtaining feedback from early implementers of the program.

Conclusion: This systematic yet pragmatic and iterative intervention development process is potentially applicable to any injury prevention topic across all sports settings and levels. It will guide researchers wishing to undertake intervention development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-341
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sport and Health Science
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Australian football
  • Implementation
  • Intervention development
  • Lower limb injuries
  • Research-to-practice
  • Sports injury prevention
  • Translation

Cite this

Donaldson, Alexander ; Lloyd, David G ; Gabbe, Belinda Jane ; Cook, Jillianne Leigh ; Young, Warren ; White, Peta ; Finch, Caroline Frances. / Scientific evidence is just the starting point : A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions. In: Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2016 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 334-341.
@article{7884d71a520c46a0b9d58f1c84425137,
title = "Scientific evidence is just the starting point: A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions",
abstract = "Background: The 2 most cited sports injury prevention research frameworks incorporate intervention development, yet little guidance is available in the sports science literature on how to undertake this complex process. This paper presents a generalizable process for developing implementable sports injury prevention interventions, including a case study applying the process to develop a lower limb injury prevention exercise training program (FootyFirst) for community Australian football.Methods: The intervention development process is underpinned by 2 complementary premises: (1) that evidence-based practice integrates the best available scientific evidence with practitioner expertise and end-user values and (2) that research evidence alone is insufficient to develop implementable interventions.Results: The generalizable 6-step intervention development process involves (1) compiling research evidence, clinical experience, and knowledge of the implementation context; (2) consulting with experts; (3) engaging with end users; (4) testing the intervention; (5) using theory; and (6) obtaining feedback from early implementers. Following each step, intervention content and presentation should be revised to ensure that the final intervention includes evidence-informed content that is likely to be adopted, properly implemented, and sustained over time by the targeted intervention deliverers. For FootyFirst, this process involved establishing a multidisciplinary intervention development group, conducting 2 targeted literature reviews, undertaking an online expert consensus process, conducting focus groups with program end users, testing the program multiple times in different contexts, and obtaining feedback from early implementers of the program.Conclusion: This systematic yet pragmatic and iterative intervention development process is potentially applicable to any injury prevention topic across all sports settings and levels. It will guide researchers wishing to undertake intervention development.",
keywords = "Australian football, Implementation, Intervention development, Lower limb injuries, Research-to-practice, Sports injury prevention, Translation",
author = "Alexander Donaldson and Lloyd, {David G} and Gabbe, {Belinda Jane} and Cook, {Jillianne Leigh} and Warren Young and Peta White and Finch, {Caroline Frances}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "334--341",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Health Science",
issn = "2095-2546",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Scientific evidence is just the starting point : A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions. / Donaldson, Alexander; Lloyd, David G; Gabbe, Belinda Jane; Cook, Jillianne Leigh; Young, Warren; White, Peta; Finch, Caroline Frances.

In: Journal of Sport and Health Science, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 334-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific evidence is just the starting point

T2 - A generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions

AU - Donaldson, Alexander

AU - Lloyd, David G

AU - Gabbe, Belinda Jane

AU - Cook, Jillianne Leigh

AU - Young, Warren

AU - White, Peta

AU - Finch, Caroline Frances

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background: The 2 most cited sports injury prevention research frameworks incorporate intervention development, yet little guidance is available in the sports science literature on how to undertake this complex process. This paper presents a generalizable process for developing implementable sports injury prevention interventions, including a case study applying the process to develop a lower limb injury prevention exercise training program (FootyFirst) for community Australian football.Methods: The intervention development process is underpinned by 2 complementary premises: (1) that evidence-based practice integrates the best available scientific evidence with practitioner expertise and end-user values and (2) that research evidence alone is insufficient to develop implementable interventions.Results: The generalizable 6-step intervention development process involves (1) compiling research evidence, clinical experience, and knowledge of the implementation context; (2) consulting with experts; (3) engaging with end users; (4) testing the intervention; (5) using theory; and (6) obtaining feedback from early implementers. Following each step, intervention content and presentation should be revised to ensure that the final intervention includes evidence-informed content that is likely to be adopted, properly implemented, and sustained over time by the targeted intervention deliverers. For FootyFirst, this process involved establishing a multidisciplinary intervention development group, conducting 2 targeted literature reviews, undertaking an online expert consensus process, conducting focus groups with program end users, testing the program multiple times in different contexts, and obtaining feedback from early implementers of the program.Conclusion: This systematic yet pragmatic and iterative intervention development process is potentially applicable to any injury prevention topic across all sports settings and levels. It will guide researchers wishing to undertake intervention development.

AB - Background: The 2 most cited sports injury prevention research frameworks incorporate intervention development, yet little guidance is available in the sports science literature on how to undertake this complex process. This paper presents a generalizable process for developing implementable sports injury prevention interventions, including a case study applying the process to develop a lower limb injury prevention exercise training program (FootyFirst) for community Australian football.Methods: The intervention development process is underpinned by 2 complementary premises: (1) that evidence-based practice integrates the best available scientific evidence with practitioner expertise and end-user values and (2) that research evidence alone is insufficient to develop implementable interventions.Results: The generalizable 6-step intervention development process involves (1) compiling research evidence, clinical experience, and knowledge of the implementation context; (2) consulting with experts; (3) engaging with end users; (4) testing the intervention; (5) using theory; and (6) obtaining feedback from early implementers. Following each step, intervention content and presentation should be revised to ensure that the final intervention includes evidence-informed content that is likely to be adopted, properly implemented, and sustained over time by the targeted intervention deliverers. For FootyFirst, this process involved establishing a multidisciplinary intervention development group, conducting 2 targeted literature reviews, undertaking an online expert consensus process, conducting focus groups with program end users, testing the program multiple times in different contexts, and obtaining feedback from early implementers of the program.Conclusion: This systematic yet pragmatic and iterative intervention development process is potentially applicable to any injury prevention topic across all sports settings and levels. It will guide researchers wishing to undertake intervention development.

KW - Australian football

KW - Implementation

KW - Intervention development

KW - Lower limb injuries

KW - Research-to-practice

KW - Sports injury prevention

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995579385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 334

EP - 341

JO - Journal of Sport and Health Science

JF - Journal of Sport and Health Science

SN - 2095-2546

IS - 3

ER -