School self-evaluation for school improvement: Examining the measuring properties of the LEAD surveys

Panayiotis Antoniou, Jacqui Myburgh-Louw, Peter Gronn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research evidence suggests school self-evaluation with the participation of school stakeholders could improve teaching and learning. Identification and use of appropriate self-evaluation frameworks, however, is not an easy task for schools. Such a framework, the LEAD School Effectiveness Surveys, has been developed by Independent Schools Victoria in Australia. The LEAD suite of school stakeholder surveys enables schools to evaluate their overall effectiveness in several domains and make informed decisions for school improvement. This article evaluates the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys and discusses the ways in which school self-evaluation results could contribute to school improvement. Data were gathered from a total of 119,749 students, teaching staff, general and parents taking the LEAD Surveys in 112 independent (non-government) schools and followed a five-year longitudinal design from 2009 to 2013. The results support the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys. The importance of evaluating the measuring properties of instruments used for school self-evaluation is discussed and suggestions for school self-evaluation are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-210
Number of pages20
JournalAustralian Journal of Education
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • content and construct validity
  • face
  • LEAD surveys
  • school improvement
  • school policy
  • School self-evaluation
  • structural equation modelling
  • survey reliability

Cite this

@article{2e6d4b15b9ec4b9f85c0749b472d9bec,
title = "School self-evaluation for school improvement: Examining the measuring properties of the LEAD surveys",
abstract = "Research evidence suggests school self-evaluation with the participation of school stakeholders could improve teaching and learning. Identification and use of appropriate self-evaluation frameworks, however, is not an easy task for schools. Such a framework, the LEAD School Effectiveness Surveys, has been developed by Independent Schools Victoria in Australia. The LEAD suite of school stakeholder surveys enables schools to evaluate their overall effectiveness in several domains and make informed decisions for school improvement. This article evaluates the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys and discusses the ways in which school self-evaluation results could contribute to school improvement. Data were gathered from a total of 119,749 students, teaching staff, general and parents taking the LEAD Surveys in 112 independent (non-government) schools and followed a five-year longitudinal design from 2009 to 2013. The results support the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys. The importance of evaluating the measuring properties of instruments used for school self-evaluation is discussed and suggestions for school self-evaluation are provided.",
keywords = "confirmatory factor analysis, content and construct validity, face, LEAD surveys, school improvement, school policy, School self-evaluation, structural equation modelling, survey reliability",
author = "Panayiotis Antoniou and Jacqui Myburgh-Louw and Peter Gronn",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0004944116667310",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "191--210",
journal = "Australian Journal of Education",
issn = "0004-9441",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

School self-evaluation for school improvement : Examining the measuring properties of the LEAD surveys. / Antoniou, Panayiotis; Myburgh-Louw, Jacqui; Gronn, Peter.

In: Australian Journal of Education, Vol. 60, No. 3, 01.11.2016, p. 191-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - School self-evaluation for school improvement

T2 - Examining the measuring properties of the LEAD surveys

AU - Antoniou, Panayiotis

AU - Myburgh-Louw, Jacqui

AU - Gronn, Peter

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Research evidence suggests school self-evaluation with the participation of school stakeholders could improve teaching and learning. Identification and use of appropriate self-evaluation frameworks, however, is not an easy task for schools. Such a framework, the LEAD School Effectiveness Surveys, has been developed by Independent Schools Victoria in Australia. The LEAD suite of school stakeholder surveys enables schools to evaluate their overall effectiveness in several domains and make informed decisions for school improvement. This article evaluates the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys and discusses the ways in which school self-evaluation results could contribute to school improvement. Data were gathered from a total of 119,749 students, teaching staff, general and parents taking the LEAD Surveys in 112 independent (non-government) schools and followed a five-year longitudinal design from 2009 to 2013. The results support the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys. The importance of evaluating the measuring properties of instruments used for school self-evaluation is discussed and suggestions for school self-evaluation are provided.

AB - Research evidence suggests school self-evaluation with the participation of school stakeholders could improve teaching and learning. Identification and use of appropriate self-evaluation frameworks, however, is not an easy task for schools. Such a framework, the LEAD School Effectiveness Surveys, has been developed by Independent Schools Victoria in Australia. The LEAD suite of school stakeholder surveys enables schools to evaluate their overall effectiveness in several domains and make informed decisions for school improvement. This article evaluates the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys and discusses the ways in which school self-evaluation results could contribute to school improvement. Data were gathered from a total of 119,749 students, teaching staff, general and parents taking the LEAD Surveys in 112 independent (non-government) schools and followed a five-year longitudinal design from 2009 to 2013. The results support the reliability as well as the face, content and construct validity of the LEAD surveys. The importance of evaluating the measuring properties of instruments used for school self-evaluation is discussed and suggestions for school self-evaluation are provided.

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - content and construct validity

KW - face

KW - LEAD surveys

KW - school improvement

KW - school policy

KW - School self-evaluation

KW - structural equation modelling

KW - survey reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994524528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0004944116667310

DO - 10.1177/0004944116667310

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 191

EP - 210

JO - Australian Journal of Education

JF - Australian Journal of Education

SN - 0004-9441

IS - 3

ER -