Sample size estimates for well-powered cross-sectional cortical thickness studies

Heath R. Pardoe, David F. Abbott, Graeme D. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Cortical thickness mapping is a widely used method for the analysis of neuroanatomical differences between subject groups. We applied power analysis methods over a range of image processing parameters to derive a model that allows researchers to calculate the number of subjects required to ensure a well-powered cross-sectional cortical thickness study. Methods: 0.9-mm isotropic T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE MRI scans from 98 controls (53 females, age 29.1 ± 9.7 years) were processed using Freesurfer 5.0. Power analyses were carried out using vertex-wise variance estimates from the coregistered cortical thickness maps, systematically varying processing parameters. A genetic programming approach was used to derive a model describing the relationship between sample size and processing parameters. The model was validated on four Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative control datasets (mean 126.5 subjects/site, age 76.6 ± 5.0 years). Results: Approximately 50 subjects per group are required to detect a 0.25-mm thickness difference; less than 10 subjects per group are required for differences of 1 mm (two-sided test, 10 mm smoothing, α = 0.05). Sample size estimates were heterogeneous over the cortical surface. The model yielded sample size predictions within 2-6% of that determined experimentally using independent data from four other datasets. Fitting parameters of the model to data from each site reduced the estimation error to less than 2%. Conclusions: The derived model provides a simple tool for researchers to calculate how many subjects should be included in a well-powered cortical thickness analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3000-3009
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cortical thickness
  • Morphometry
  • MRI
  • Neuroimaging
  • Power analysis
  • Study design

Cite this