TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of valve repositioning during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Lotus Valve System
AU - Rashid, Hashrul N.Z.
AU - Gooley, Robert
AU - McCormick, Liam
AU - Zaman, Sarah
AU - Ramkumar, Satish
AU - Jackson, Damon
AU - Amiruddin, Ameera
AU - Nasis, Arthur
AU - Cameron, James
AU - Meredith, Ian T.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of valve repositioning following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Lotus Valve System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Introduction TAVR is a well-established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. The Lotus Valve System is fully repositionable and retrievable. Valve repositioning has the potential to minimize TAVR-related complications caused by valve malposition; however, the effect on adverse event rates such as stroke is unknown. Methods Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with the Lotus Valve System (n = 125) were prospectively recruited. Patients who did not require valve repositioning (Group A) were compared to patients who required one or more valve repositions (Group B). The primary end-point was 30-day occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Secondary end-points included each component of the primary end-point, new pacemaker insertion, and procedural or 30-day major adverse events, defined according to VARC-2 definitions. Results Valve repositioning was utilized in 60.8% (76/125) of patients including 17.1% (13/76) who required full valve resheathing. The most frequent indications for valve repositioning were altering the depth and angulation of initial implantation (69.7%), reducing paravalvular regurgitation (13.2%), and attempt to correct new or worsened heart block (7.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary end-point occurred in 12.2% and 6.6% of Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.10). Thirty-day new pacemaker implantation was 34.1% and 18.8% in Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.06). The secondary end-point measures were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion Repositioning facilitated correct anatomical positioning of all devices leading to optimal prosthesis hemodynamics and a trend to lower pacemaker rate without increased risk of MACCE.
AB - Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of valve repositioning following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Lotus Valve System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Introduction TAVR is a well-established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. The Lotus Valve System is fully repositionable and retrievable. Valve repositioning has the potential to minimize TAVR-related complications caused by valve malposition; however, the effect on adverse event rates such as stroke is unknown. Methods Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with the Lotus Valve System (n = 125) were prospectively recruited. Patients who did not require valve repositioning (Group A) were compared to patients who required one or more valve repositions (Group B). The primary end-point was 30-day occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Secondary end-points included each component of the primary end-point, new pacemaker insertion, and procedural or 30-day major adverse events, defined according to VARC-2 definitions. Results Valve repositioning was utilized in 60.8% (76/125) of patients including 17.1% (13/76) who required full valve resheathing. The most frequent indications for valve repositioning were altering the depth and angulation of initial implantation (69.7%), reducing paravalvular regurgitation (13.2%), and attempt to correct new or worsened heart block (7.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary end-point occurred in 12.2% and 6.6% of Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.10). Thirty-day new pacemaker implantation was 34.1% and 18.8% in Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.06). The secondary end-point measures were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion Repositioning facilitated correct anatomical positioning of all devices leading to optimal prosthesis hemodynamics and a trend to lower pacemaker rate without increased risk of MACCE.
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Lotus valve
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007282520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.11.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85007282520
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 70
SP - 55
EP - 61
JO - Journal of Cardiology
JF - Journal of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -