Rural training pathways

The return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Limited evidence exists about the extent to which doctors are returning to rural region(s) where they had previously trained. This study aims to investigate the rate at which medical students who have trained for 12months or more in a rural region return to practice in that same region in their early medical career. A secondary aim is to investigate whether there is an independent or additional association with the effect of longer duration of rural exposure in a region (18-24months) and for those completing both schooling and training in the same rural region. Methods: The outcome was rural region of work, based on postcode of work location in 2017 for graduates spanning 1-9years post-graduation, for one large medical program in Victoria, Australia. Region of rural training, combined with region of secondary schooling and duration of rural training, was explored for its association with region of practice. A multinomial logistic regression model, accounting for other covariates, measured the strength of association with practising in the same rural region as where they had trained. Results: Overall, 357/2451 (15%) graduates were working rurally, with 90/357 (25%) working in the same rural region as where they did rural training. Similarly, 41/170 (24%) were working in the same region as where they completed schooling. Longer duration (18-24 vs 12months) of rural training (relative risk ratio, RRR, 3.37, 1.89-5.98) and completing both schooling and training in the same rural region (RRR: 4.47, 2.14-9.36) were associated with returning to practice in the same rural region after training. Conclusions: Medical graduates practising rurally in their early career (1-9years post-graduation) are likely to have previous connections to the region, through either their basic medical training, their secondary schooling, or both. Social accountability of medical schools and rural medical workforce outcomes could be improved by policies that enable preferential selection and training of prospective medical students from rural regions that need more doctors, and further enhanced by longer duration of within-region training.

Original languageEnglish
Article number56
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Resources for Health
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Education
  • Location
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Rural pathways
  • Rural training
  • Workforce

Cite this

@article{02bc91b2974c484da5421d0279982a99,
title = "Rural training pathways: The return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training",
abstract = "Background: Limited evidence exists about the extent to which doctors are returning to rural region(s) where they had previously trained. This study aims to investigate the rate at which medical students who have trained for 12months or more in a rural region return to practice in that same region in their early medical career. A secondary aim is to investigate whether there is an independent or additional association with the effect of longer duration of rural exposure in a region (18-24months) and for those completing both schooling and training in the same rural region. Methods: The outcome was rural region of work, based on postcode of work location in 2017 for graduates spanning 1-9years post-graduation, for one large medical program in Victoria, Australia. Region of rural training, combined with region of secondary schooling and duration of rural training, was explored for its association with region of practice. A multinomial logistic regression model, accounting for other covariates, measured the strength of association with practising in the same rural region as where they had trained. Results: Overall, 357/2451 (15{\%}) graduates were working rurally, with 90/357 (25{\%}) working in the same rural region as where they did rural training. Similarly, 41/170 (24{\%}) were working in the same region as where they completed schooling. Longer duration (18-24 vs 12months) of rural training (relative risk ratio, RRR, 3.37, 1.89-5.98) and completing both schooling and training in the same rural region (RRR: 4.47, 2.14-9.36) were associated with returning to practice in the same rural region after training. Conclusions: Medical graduates practising rurally in their early career (1-9years post-graduation) are likely to have previous connections to the region, through either their basic medical training, their secondary schooling, or both. Social accountability of medical schools and rural medical workforce outcomes could be improved by policies that enable preferential selection and training of prospective medical students from rural regions that need more doctors, and further enhanced by longer duration of within-region training.",
keywords = "Education, Location, Recruitment, Retention, Rural pathways, Rural training, Workforce",
author = "McGrail, {Matthew R.} and O'Sullivan, {Belinda G.} and Russell, {Deborah J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s12960-018-0323-7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Human Resources for Health",
issn = "1478-4491",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural training pathways

T2 - The return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training

AU - McGrail, Matthew R.

AU - O'Sullivan, Belinda G.

AU - Russell, Deborah J.

PY - 2018/10/22

Y1 - 2018/10/22

N2 - Background: Limited evidence exists about the extent to which doctors are returning to rural region(s) where they had previously trained. This study aims to investigate the rate at which medical students who have trained for 12months or more in a rural region return to practice in that same region in their early medical career. A secondary aim is to investigate whether there is an independent or additional association with the effect of longer duration of rural exposure in a region (18-24months) and for those completing both schooling and training in the same rural region. Methods: The outcome was rural region of work, based on postcode of work location in 2017 for graduates spanning 1-9years post-graduation, for one large medical program in Victoria, Australia. Region of rural training, combined with region of secondary schooling and duration of rural training, was explored for its association with region of practice. A multinomial logistic regression model, accounting for other covariates, measured the strength of association with practising in the same rural region as where they had trained. Results: Overall, 357/2451 (15%) graduates were working rurally, with 90/357 (25%) working in the same rural region as where they did rural training. Similarly, 41/170 (24%) were working in the same region as where they completed schooling. Longer duration (18-24 vs 12months) of rural training (relative risk ratio, RRR, 3.37, 1.89-5.98) and completing both schooling and training in the same rural region (RRR: 4.47, 2.14-9.36) were associated with returning to practice in the same rural region after training. Conclusions: Medical graduates practising rurally in their early career (1-9years post-graduation) are likely to have previous connections to the region, through either their basic medical training, their secondary schooling, or both. Social accountability of medical schools and rural medical workforce outcomes could be improved by policies that enable preferential selection and training of prospective medical students from rural regions that need more doctors, and further enhanced by longer duration of within-region training.

AB - Background: Limited evidence exists about the extent to which doctors are returning to rural region(s) where they had previously trained. This study aims to investigate the rate at which medical students who have trained for 12months or more in a rural region return to practice in that same region in their early medical career. A secondary aim is to investigate whether there is an independent or additional association with the effect of longer duration of rural exposure in a region (18-24months) and for those completing both schooling and training in the same rural region. Methods: The outcome was rural region of work, based on postcode of work location in 2017 for graduates spanning 1-9years post-graduation, for one large medical program in Victoria, Australia. Region of rural training, combined with region of secondary schooling and duration of rural training, was explored for its association with region of practice. A multinomial logistic regression model, accounting for other covariates, measured the strength of association with practising in the same rural region as where they had trained. Results: Overall, 357/2451 (15%) graduates were working rurally, with 90/357 (25%) working in the same rural region as where they did rural training. Similarly, 41/170 (24%) were working in the same region as where they completed schooling. Longer duration (18-24 vs 12months) of rural training (relative risk ratio, RRR, 3.37, 1.89-5.98) and completing both schooling and training in the same rural region (RRR: 4.47, 2.14-9.36) were associated with returning to practice in the same rural region after training. Conclusions: Medical graduates practising rurally in their early career (1-9years post-graduation) are likely to have previous connections to the region, through either their basic medical training, their secondary schooling, or both. Social accountability of medical schools and rural medical workforce outcomes could be improved by policies that enable preferential selection and training of prospective medical students from rural regions that need more doctors, and further enhanced by longer duration of within-region training.

KW - Education

KW - Location

KW - Recruitment

KW - Retention

KW - Rural pathways

KW - Rural training

KW - Workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055195187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12960-018-0323-7

DO - 10.1186/s12960-018-0323-7

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Human Resources for Health

JF - Human Resources for Health

SN - 1478-4491

IS - 1

M1 - 56

ER -