Routinely armed and unarmed police

What can the scandinavian experience teach us?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article introduces the author's recent study on the 'strategic impact' of routinely arming the New Zealand Police and discusses how two significant research findings are consistent with published theory. First, the utility of taking a binary, black, and white approach when analysing the 'routinely armed versus routinely unarmed' debate, is limited in terms of considering police officer behaviour. This is because police departmental policies shape police officer risk-taking and behaviour to a considerable degree. Second, despite departmental policies, the routine armament of a routinely unarmed police force, say for health and safety reasons, may be counterproductive; such a change exposes police officers to increased risks. Both findings come from an analysis of Scandinavian police forces. The author's study was primarily concerned with the police forces of Norway and Sweden; however, comparisons were made, at times, within a wider Scandinavian context.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpau012
Pages (from-to)183-192
Number of pages10
JournalPolicing (Oxford): A Journal of Policy and Practice
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{e3e3ff6f2cb341fb8c1889786a5e16b0,
title = "Routinely armed and unarmed police: What can the scandinavian experience teach us?",
abstract = "This article introduces the author's recent study on the 'strategic impact' of routinely arming the New Zealand Police and discusses how two significant research findings are consistent with published theory. First, the utility of taking a binary, black, and white approach when analysing the 'routinely armed versus routinely unarmed' debate, is limited in terms of considering police officer behaviour. This is because police departmental policies shape police officer risk-taking and behaviour to a considerable degree. Second, despite departmental policies, the routine armament of a routinely unarmed police force, say for health and safety reasons, may be counterproductive; such a change exposes police officers to increased risks. Both findings come from an analysis of Scandinavian police forces. The author's study was primarily concerned with the police forces of Norway and Sweden; however, comparisons were made, at times, within a wider Scandinavian context.",
author = "Ross Hendy",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/police/pau012",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "183--192",
journal = "Policing (Oxford): A Journal of Policy and Practice",
issn = "1752-4520",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Routinely armed and unarmed police : What can the scandinavian experience teach us? / Hendy, Ross.

In: Policing (Oxford): A Journal of Policy and Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, pau012, 06.2014, p. 183-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routinely armed and unarmed police

T2 - What can the scandinavian experience teach us?

AU - Hendy, Ross

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - This article introduces the author's recent study on the 'strategic impact' of routinely arming the New Zealand Police and discusses how two significant research findings are consistent with published theory. First, the utility of taking a binary, black, and white approach when analysing the 'routinely armed versus routinely unarmed' debate, is limited in terms of considering police officer behaviour. This is because police departmental policies shape police officer risk-taking and behaviour to a considerable degree. Second, despite departmental policies, the routine armament of a routinely unarmed police force, say for health and safety reasons, may be counterproductive; such a change exposes police officers to increased risks. Both findings come from an analysis of Scandinavian police forces. The author's study was primarily concerned with the police forces of Norway and Sweden; however, comparisons were made, at times, within a wider Scandinavian context.

AB - This article introduces the author's recent study on the 'strategic impact' of routinely arming the New Zealand Police and discusses how two significant research findings are consistent with published theory. First, the utility of taking a binary, black, and white approach when analysing the 'routinely armed versus routinely unarmed' debate, is limited in terms of considering police officer behaviour. This is because police departmental policies shape police officer risk-taking and behaviour to a considerable degree. Second, despite departmental policies, the routine armament of a routinely unarmed police force, say for health and safety reasons, may be counterproductive; such a change exposes police officers to increased risks. Both findings come from an analysis of Scandinavian police forces. The author's study was primarily concerned with the police forces of Norway and Sweden; however, comparisons were made, at times, within a wider Scandinavian context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946169580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/police/pau012

DO - 10.1093/police/pau012

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 183

EP - 192

JO - Policing (Oxford): A Journal of Policy and Practice

JF - Policing (Oxford): A Journal of Policy and Practice

SN - 1752-4520

IS - 2

M1 - pau012

ER -