Routine application of cervial collars - What is the evidence? (Editorial)

Conor Deasy, Peter Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most emergency medicine systems (EMS) around the world apply semi-rigid cervical collars as a routine to all injured patients with a significant mechanism of injury. The science behind this ritual is limited and the consequences may not always be beneficial. The application of rigorous clinical trial methodology in the prehospital setting is challenging but this should not prevent an evidence base being developed. There are many considerations that preclude good prehospital research. These include ethical considerations, patient consent, randomisation procedures and access to patient follow up information. In addition the paramedic team already operates in a time pressured environment and research procedures are rarely a high priority in this setting. Against this backdrop, trials such as Bernard et al.a??s1 where paramedic rapid sequence intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was shown to improve neurologic outcomes at 6 months compared with intubation in the hospital are remarkable. It is possible to challenge accepted dogma in the protocolised world of prehospital care. An
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841 - 842
Number of pages2
JournalInjury Extra
Volume42
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this