Robots, rape, and representation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Sex robots are likely to play an important role in shaping public understandings of sex and of relations between the sexes in the future. This paper contributes to the larger project of understanding how they will do so by examining the ethics of the “rape” of robots. I argue that the design of realistic female robots that could explicitly refuse consent to sex in order to facilitate rape fantasy would be unethical because sex with robots in these circumstances is a representation of the rape of a woman, which may increase the rate of rape, expresses disrespect for women, and demonstrates a significant character defect. Even when the intention is not to facilitate rape, the design of robots that can explicitly refuse consent is problematic due to the likelihood that some users will experiment with raping them. Designing robots that lack the capacity to explicitly refuse consent may be morally problematic depending on which of two accounts of the representational content of sex with realistic humanoid robots is correct.
LanguageEnglish
Pages465-477
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Social Robotics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Robots
  • Sex robots
  • Ethics
  • Rape
  • Representation
  • HRI

Cite this

@article{4f0bc6a9de524292a13e48967f7ceee5,
title = "Robots, rape, and representation",
abstract = "Sex robots are likely to play an important role in shaping public understandings of sex and of relations between the sexes in the future. This paper contributes to the larger project of understanding how they will do so by examining the ethics of the “rape” of robots. I argue that the design of realistic female robots that could explicitly refuse consent to sex in order to facilitate rape fantasy would be unethical because sex with robots in these circumstances is a representation of the rape of a woman, which may increase the rate of rape, expresses disrespect for women, and demonstrates a significant character defect. Even when the intention is not to facilitate rape, the design of robots that can explicitly refuse consent is problematic due to the likelihood that some users will experiment with raping them. Designing robots that lack the capacity to explicitly refuse consent may be morally problematic depending on which of two accounts of the representational content of sex with realistic humanoid robots is correct.",
keywords = "Robots, Sex robots, Ethics, Rape, Representation, HRI",
author = "Robert Sparrow",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "465--477",
journal = "International Journal of Social Robotics",
issn = "1875-4791",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Robots, rape, and representation. / Sparrow, Robert.

In: International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2017, p. 465-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robots, rape, and representation

AU - Sparrow,Robert

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Sex robots are likely to play an important role in shaping public understandings of sex and of relations between the sexes in the future. This paper contributes to the larger project of understanding how they will do so by examining the ethics of the “rape” of robots. I argue that the design of realistic female robots that could explicitly refuse consent to sex in order to facilitate rape fantasy would be unethical because sex with robots in these circumstances is a representation of the rape of a woman, which may increase the rate of rape, expresses disrespect for women, and demonstrates a significant character defect. Even when the intention is not to facilitate rape, the design of robots that can explicitly refuse consent is problematic due to the likelihood that some users will experiment with raping them. Designing robots that lack the capacity to explicitly refuse consent may be morally problematic depending on which of two accounts of the representational content of sex with realistic humanoid robots is correct.

AB - Sex robots are likely to play an important role in shaping public understandings of sex and of relations between the sexes in the future. This paper contributes to the larger project of understanding how they will do so by examining the ethics of the “rape” of robots. I argue that the design of realistic female robots that could explicitly refuse consent to sex in order to facilitate rape fantasy would be unethical because sex with robots in these circumstances is a representation of the rape of a woman, which may increase the rate of rape, expresses disrespect for women, and demonstrates a significant character defect. Even when the intention is not to facilitate rape, the design of robots that can explicitly refuse consent is problematic due to the likelihood that some users will experiment with raping them. Designing robots that lack the capacity to explicitly refuse consent may be morally problematic depending on which of two accounts of the representational content of sex with realistic humanoid robots is correct.

KW - Robots

KW - Sex robots

KW - Ethics

KW - Rape

KW - Representation

KW - HRI

U2 - 10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z

DO - 10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 465

EP - 477

JO - International Journal of Social Robotics

T2 - International Journal of Social Robotics

JF - International Journal of Social Robotics

SN - 1875-4791

IS - 4

ER -