TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in bariatric surgery
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes
AU - Leang, Yit J.
AU - Mayavel, Naveen
AU - Yang, Wilson T.W.
AU - Kong, Joseph C.H.
AU - Hensman, Chrys
AU - Burton, Paul R.
AU - Brown, Wendy A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Wendy A. Brown received grants from Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Applied Medical, and Apollo Endosurgery; grants and personal fees from GORE and Novo Nordisc; and personal fees from Merck Sharpe and Dohme, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Background: Robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as a compelling approach to bariatric surgery. However, current literature has not consistently demonstrated superior outcomes to laparoscopic bariatric surgery to justify its higher cost. With its mechanical advantages, the potential gains from the robotic surgical platform are likely to be apparent in more complex cases such as gastric bypass, especially revisional cases. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the literature and evaluate the peri-operative outcomes of patients with obesity undergoing robotic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Setting: Systematic review. Methods: A literature search of Embase, Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass for obesity were included. Results: Twenty-eight eligible studies comprised a total of 82,155 patients; 9051 robotic bypass surgery (RBS) versus 73,104 laparoscopic bypass surgery (LBS) were included. All included studies compared Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. RBS was noted to have higher reoperation rate within 30 days (4.4% versus 3.4%; odds ratio 1.31 [95% CI, 1.04–1.66]; P = .027; I2 = 43.5%) than LBS. All other endpoints measured (complication rate, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, surgical site infections, hospital readmission, length of stay, operative time, conversion rate and mortality) did not show any difference between RBS and LBS. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in key outcome measures in robotic versus laparoscopic gastric bypass. RBS was associated with a slightly higher reoperation rate and there was no reduction in overall complication rate with the use of robotic platform.
AB - Background: Robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as a compelling approach to bariatric surgery. However, current literature has not consistently demonstrated superior outcomes to laparoscopic bariatric surgery to justify its higher cost. With its mechanical advantages, the potential gains from the robotic surgical platform are likely to be apparent in more complex cases such as gastric bypass, especially revisional cases. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the literature and evaluate the peri-operative outcomes of patients with obesity undergoing robotic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Setting: Systematic review. Methods: A literature search of Embase, Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass for obesity were included. Results: Twenty-eight eligible studies comprised a total of 82,155 patients; 9051 robotic bypass surgery (RBS) versus 73,104 laparoscopic bypass surgery (LBS) were included. All included studies compared Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. RBS was noted to have higher reoperation rate within 30 days (4.4% versus 3.4%; odds ratio 1.31 [95% CI, 1.04–1.66]; P = .027; I2 = 43.5%) than LBS. All other endpoints measured (complication rate, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, surgical site infections, hospital readmission, length of stay, operative time, conversion rate and mortality) did not show any difference between RBS and LBS. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in key outcome measures in robotic versus laparoscopic gastric bypass. RBS was associated with a slightly higher reoperation rate and there was no reduction in overall complication rate with the use of robotic platform.
KW - Clinical outcomes
KW - Laparoscopic surgery
KW - Metabolic surgery
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Obesity
KW - Robotic surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85171893973
U2 - 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 37730445
AN - SCOPUS:85171893973
SN - 1550-7289
VL - 20
SP - 62
EP - 71
JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
IS - 1
ER -