Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care

A Systematic Review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Depression rates are substantially higher among older adults in long-term care when compared with older adults in the community. Furthermore, the needs of older adults in long-term care are increasingly complex, and risk factors that contribute to depression in this population are unclear. This limits not only the identification of those at risk for depression but also the development of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on risk factors for depression. Methods: Searches were performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and Scopus for research published 1980–2017. Data were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 11,703 participants, with a mean sample size of 1,064. The most consistently supported risk factor was cognitive impairment, followed by functional impairment and baseline depression score. Conclusions: The studies lacked a systematic approach to investigating risk factors for depression, and the research remains largely atheoretical. Few risk factors were consistently studied, with over 20 risk factors examined no more than once each. Psychological and environmental risk factors, which may be modifiable and have the potential to inform therapeutic interventions and preventative strategies, remain under-studied. Clinical Implications: The most consistently supported risk factors—cognitive impairment, functional disability and baseline depression score—have the potential to inform screening protocols and should be monitored longitudinally. When developing psychotherapeutic interventions, close consideration should be given to cognitive and functional impairment as barriers to implementation and uptake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-237
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Gerontologist
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{cd48455be7e448ae88759c2cdd537f4b,
title = "Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Objectives: Depression rates are substantially higher among older adults in long-term care when compared with older adults in the community. Furthermore, the needs of older adults in long-term care are increasingly complex, and risk factors that contribute to depression in this population are unclear. This limits not only the identification of those at risk for depression but also the development of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on risk factors for depression. Methods: Searches were performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and Scopus for research published 1980–2017. Data were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 11,703 participants, with a mean sample size of 1,064. The most consistently supported risk factor was cognitive impairment, followed by functional impairment and baseline depression score. Conclusions: The studies lacked a systematic approach to investigating risk factors for depression, and the research remains largely atheoretical. Few risk factors were consistently studied, with over 20 risk factors examined no more than once each. Psychological and environmental risk factors, which may be modifiable and have the potential to inform therapeutic interventions and preventative strategies, remain under-studied. Clinical Implications: The most consistently supported risk factors—cognitive impairment, functional disability and baseline depression score—have the potential to inform screening protocols and should be monitored longitudinally. When developing psychotherapeutic interventions, close consideration should be given to cognitive and functional impairment as barriers to implementation and uptake.",
author = "Rebecca Chau and Kissane, {David W.} and Davison, {Tanya E.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/07317115.2018.1490371",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "224--237",
journal = "Clinical Gerontologist",
issn = "0731-7115",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care : A Systematic Review. / Chau, Rebecca; Kissane, David W.; Davison, Tanya E.

In: Clinical Gerontologist, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2019, p. 224-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Chau, Rebecca

AU - Kissane, David W.

AU - Davison, Tanya E.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objectives: Depression rates are substantially higher among older adults in long-term care when compared with older adults in the community. Furthermore, the needs of older adults in long-term care are increasingly complex, and risk factors that contribute to depression in this population are unclear. This limits not only the identification of those at risk for depression but also the development of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on risk factors for depression. Methods: Searches were performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and Scopus for research published 1980–2017. Data were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 11,703 participants, with a mean sample size of 1,064. The most consistently supported risk factor was cognitive impairment, followed by functional impairment and baseline depression score. Conclusions: The studies lacked a systematic approach to investigating risk factors for depression, and the research remains largely atheoretical. Few risk factors were consistently studied, with over 20 risk factors examined no more than once each. Psychological and environmental risk factors, which may be modifiable and have the potential to inform therapeutic interventions and preventative strategies, remain under-studied. Clinical Implications: The most consistently supported risk factors—cognitive impairment, functional disability and baseline depression score—have the potential to inform screening protocols and should be monitored longitudinally. When developing psychotherapeutic interventions, close consideration should be given to cognitive and functional impairment as barriers to implementation and uptake.

AB - Objectives: Depression rates are substantially higher among older adults in long-term care when compared with older adults in the community. Furthermore, the needs of older adults in long-term care are increasingly complex, and risk factors that contribute to depression in this population are unclear. This limits not only the identification of those at risk for depression but also the development of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on risk factors for depression. Methods: Searches were performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and Scopus for research published 1980–2017. Data were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 11,703 participants, with a mean sample size of 1,064. The most consistently supported risk factor was cognitive impairment, followed by functional impairment and baseline depression score. Conclusions: The studies lacked a systematic approach to investigating risk factors for depression, and the research remains largely atheoretical. Few risk factors were consistently studied, with over 20 risk factors examined no more than once each. Psychological and environmental risk factors, which may be modifiable and have the potential to inform therapeutic interventions and preventative strategies, remain under-studied. Clinical Implications: The most consistently supported risk factors—cognitive impairment, functional disability and baseline depression score—have the potential to inform screening protocols and should be monitored longitudinally. When developing psychotherapeutic interventions, close consideration should be given to cognitive and functional impairment as barriers to implementation and uptake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049614260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07317115.2018.1490371

DO - 10.1080/07317115.2018.1490371

M3 - Review Article

VL - 42

SP - 224

EP - 237

JO - Clinical Gerontologist

JF - Clinical Gerontologist

SN - 0731-7115

IS - 3

ER -