Revisiting cell–particle association in vitro: A quantitative method to compare particle performance

Matthew Faria, Ka Fung Noi, Qiong Dai, Mattias Björnmalm, Stuart T. Johnston, Kristian Kempe, Frank Caruso, Edmund J. Crampin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Nanoengineering has the potential to revolutionize medicine by designing drug delivery systems that are both efficacious and highly selective. Determination of the affinity between cell lines and nanoparticles is thus of central importance, both to enable comparison of particles and to facilitate prediction of in vivo response. Attempts to compare particle performance can be dominated by experimental artifacts (including settling effects) or variability in experimental protocol. Instead, qualitative methods are generally used, limiting the reusability of many studies. Herein, we introduce a mathematical model-based approach to quantify the affinity between a cell–particle pairing, independent of the aforementioned confounding artifacts. The analysis presented can serve as a quantitative metric of the stealth, fouling, and targeting performance of nanoengineered particles in vitro. We validate this approach using a newly created in vitro dataset, consisting of seven different disulfide-stabilized poly(methacrylic acid) particles ranging from ~100 to 1000 nm in diameter that were incubated with three different cell lines (HeLa, THP-1, and RAW 264.7). We further expanded this dataset through the inclusion of previously published data and use it to determine which of five mathematical models best describe cell–particle association. We subsequently use this model to perform a quantitative comparison of cell–particle association for cell–particle pairings in our dataset. This analysis reveals a more complex cell–particle association relationship than a simplistic interpretation of the data, which erroneously assigns high affinity for all cell lines examined to large particles. Finally, we provide an online tool (, which allows other researchers to easily apply this modeling approach to their experimental results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Controlled Release
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2019


  • In vitro
  • Kinetic modeling
  • Mathematical modeling
  • Nanomedicine
  • Nano–bio interactions
  • Quantitative

Cite this