Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research

Tom Marcinkowski, Alan Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the early days of the field, attitude–behavior (A–B) relationships have received sustained attention in the evaluation and researching of environmental education (EE). This level of interest extends beyond the field’s scope though, in part due to a certain reliance on theoretical and empirical assertions which claim that attitudes serve as a strong precursor and/or predictor of behavior. In this paper, we consider reviews of studies on the A–B relationship in EE and other fields that routinely challenge such assumptions, leading to the questioning of corresponding foci and commitments for research, evaluation, practice, and development. With key findings from these studies hand, we highlight several insights that may be useful for dispelling some of the folklore about what matters in, and what can be argued with, A–B studies, if we are to develop the design, conduct, reporting, and critique of studies and practices of EE reliant on such relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-471
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Education Research
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Attitudes and behavior
  • quality use of evidence
  • research claims
  • research design principles
  • research findings

Cite this

@article{0f713055761740c0b261a90faf5aa560,
title = "Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research",
abstract = "Since the early days of the field, attitude–behavior (A–B) relationships have received sustained attention in the evaluation and researching of environmental education (EE). This level of interest extends beyond the field’s scope though, in part due to a certain reliance on theoretical and empirical assertions which claim that attitudes serve as a strong precursor and/or predictor of behavior. In this paper, we consider reviews of studies on the A–B relationship in EE and other fields that routinely challenge such assumptions, leading to the questioning of corresponding foci and commitments for research, evaluation, practice, and development. With key findings from these studies hand, we highlight several insights that may be useful for dispelling some of the folklore about what matters in, and what can be argued with, A–B studies, if we are to develop the design, conduct, reporting, and critique of studies and practices of EE reliant on such relationships.",
keywords = "Attitudes and behavior, quality use of evidence, research claims, research design principles, research findings",
author = "Tom Marcinkowski and Alan Reid",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "459--471",
journal = "Environmental Education Research",
issn = "1350-4622",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research. / Marcinkowski, Tom; Reid, Alan.

In: Environmental Education Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 03.04.2019, p. 459-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research

AU - Marcinkowski, Tom

AU - Reid, Alan

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Since the early days of the field, attitude–behavior (A–B) relationships have received sustained attention in the evaluation and researching of environmental education (EE). This level of interest extends beyond the field’s scope though, in part due to a certain reliance on theoretical and empirical assertions which claim that attitudes serve as a strong precursor and/or predictor of behavior. In this paper, we consider reviews of studies on the A–B relationship in EE and other fields that routinely challenge such assumptions, leading to the questioning of corresponding foci and commitments for research, evaluation, practice, and development. With key findings from these studies hand, we highlight several insights that may be useful for dispelling some of the folklore about what matters in, and what can be argued with, A–B studies, if we are to develop the design, conduct, reporting, and critique of studies and practices of EE reliant on such relationships.

AB - Since the early days of the field, attitude–behavior (A–B) relationships have received sustained attention in the evaluation and researching of environmental education (EE). This level of interest extends beyond the field’s scope though, in part due to a certain reliance on theoretical and empirical assertions which claim that attitudes serve as a strong precursor and/or predictor of behavior. In this paper, we consider reviews of studies on the A–B relationship in EE and other fields that routinely challenge such assumptions, leading to the questioning of corresponding foci and commitments for research, evaluation, practice, and development. With key findings from these studies hand, we highlight several insights that may be useful for dispelling some of the folklore about what matters in, and what can be argued with, A–B studies, if we are to develop the design, conduct, reporting, and critique of studies and practices of EE reliant on such relationships.

KW - Attitudes and behavior

KW - quality use of evidence

KW - research claims

KW - research design principles

KW - research findings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068469594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237

DO - 10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237

M3 - Editorial

VL - 25

SP - 459

EP - 471

JO - Environmental Education Research

JF - Environmental Education Research

SN - 1350-4622

IS - 4

ER -