Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Locating overviews of systematic reviews is difficult because of an absence of appropriate indexing terms and inconsistent terminology used to describe overviews. Our objective was to develop a validated search strategy to retrieve overviews in MEDLINE. Study Design and Setting We derived a test set of overviews from the references of two method articles on overviews. Two population sets were used to identify discriminating terms, that is, terms that appear frequently in the test set but infrequently in two population sets of references found in MEDLINE. We used text mining to conduct a frequency analysis of terms appearing in the titles and abstracts. Candidate terms were combined and tested in MEDLINE in various permutations, and the performance of strategies measured using sensitivity and precision. Results Two search strategies were developed: a sensitivity-maximizing strategy, achieving 93% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87, 96) and 7% precision (95% CI: 6, 8), and a sensitivity-and-precision-maximizing strategy, achieving 66% sensitivity (95% CI: 58, 74) and 21% precision (95% CI: 17, 25). Conclusion The developed search strategies enable users to more efficiently identify overviews of reviews compared to current strategies. Consistent language in describing overviews would aid in their identification, as would a specific MEDLINE Publication Type.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-118
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume74
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • MEDLINE
  • Overviews of systematic reviews
  • Search filter
  • Search strategy design
  • Sensitivity
  • Text mining

Cite this