TY - JOUR
T1 - Restrictive Practices and the ‘Need’ for Positive Behaviour Support (PBS)
T2 - A Critical Discourse Examination of Disability Policy Beliefs
AU - Hayward, Brent A.
AU - McKay-Brown, Lisa
AU - Poed, Shiralee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Few studies have considered policies which underpin the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS). The present study examined policy beliefs about PBS and their relationship to restrictive practices. Methods: Discourse network analysis (a combination of critical discourse analysis and social network analysis) was used. Results: A total of 11 policies were examined from which 38 belief statements were coded. One cluster was identified which promoted 13 dominant beliefs. Dominant discourses related to law, safety and the environment were evident. A conceptual representation of the shared PBS beliefs demonstrated contradictions in PBS policy. Conclusions: There is evidence that PBS policies have become informal rules for using restrictive practices, not reducing them. They are also acting as surrogates to debate conflicts between political, personal and bureaucratic interests. Three recommendations for improved PBS policy are provided.
AB - Background: Few studies have considered policies which underpin the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS). The present study examined policy beliefs about PBS and their relationship to restrictive practices. Methods: Discourse network analysis (a combination of critical discourse analysis and social network analysis) was used. Results: A total of 11 policies were examined from which 38 belief statements were coded. One cluster was identified which promoted 13 dominant beliefs. Dominant discourses related to law, safety and the environment were evident. A conceptual representation of the shared PBS beliefs demonstrated contradictions in PBS policy. Conclusions: There is evidence that PBS policies have become informal rules for using restrictive practices, not reducing them. They are also acting as surrogates to debate conflicts between political, personal and bureaucratic interests. Three recommendations for improved PBS policy are provided.
KW - critical discourse analysis
KW - discourse network analysis
KW - policy
KW - positive behaviour support
KW - restrictive practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126352138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17446295211062383
DO - 10.1177/17446295211062383
M3 - Article
C2 - 35285307
AN - SCOPUS:85126352138
SN - 1744-6295
VL - 27
SP - 170
EP - 189
JO - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -