Restricted modes: social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship

Clare Southerton, Daniel Marshall, Peter Aggleton, Mary Lou Rasmussen, Rob Cover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of recent controversies surrounding the censorship of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer online content, specifically on YouTube and Tumblr, we interrogate the relationship between normative understandings of sexual citizenship and the content classification regimes. We argue that these content classification systems and the platforms’ responses to public criticism both operate as norm-producing technologies, in which the complexities of sexuality and desire are obscured in order to cultivate notions of a ‘good’ lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer sexual citizen. However, despite normative work of classification seeking to distinguish between sexuality and sex, we argue that the high-profile failures of these classification systems create the conditions for users to draw attention to, rather than firm, these messy boundaries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)920-938
Number of pages19
JournalNew Media & Society
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Censorship
  • content classification
  • LGBTQ
  • platform governance
  • restricted mode
  • safe mode
  • Tumblr
  • YouTube

Cite this