Abstract
In recent times, explanations of the Capgras delusion have tended to emphasise the cognitive dysfunction that is believed to occur at the second stage of two-stage models. This is generally viewed as a response to the inadequacies of the one-stage account. Whilst accepting that some form of cognitive disruption is a necessary part of the aetiology of the Capgras delusion, I nevertheless argue that the emphasis placed on this second-stage is to the detriment of the important role played by the phenomenology underlying the disorder, both in terms of the formation and maintenance of the delusional belief. This paper therefore proposes an interactionist two-stage model in which the phenomenal experience of the Capgras patient is examined, emphasised, and its relation to top-down processing discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 177-189 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 Feb 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bottom-up and top-down processing
- Capgras delusion
- Experiential reorientation
- Lack and loss of familiarity
- Phenomenal experience
- Recognition