Response to ventilator adjustments for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality: Driving pressure versus oxygenation

Nadir Yehya, Carol L. Hodgson, Marcelo B.P. Amato, Jean Christophe Richard, Laurent J. Brochard, Alain Mercat, Ewan C. Goligher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Clinicians commonly use short-term physiologic markers to assess the benefit of ventilator adjustments. Improved arterial oxygen tension/pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) after ventilator adjustment in acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with lower mortality. However, as driving pressure (ΔP) reflects lung stress and strain, changes in ΔP may more accurately reflect benefits or harms of ventilator adjustments compared with changes in oxygenation. Objectives: We aimed to compare the association between mortality and the changes in PaO2/FIO2 and ΔP following protocolized ventilator changes. Methods: We assessed associations between mortality and changes in PaO2/FIO2 (ΔPaO2/FIO2) and ΔP (ΔΔP) after postrandomization positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume adjustment in reanalyses of the ALVEOLI (Assessment of Low Tidal Volume and Elevated End-Expiratory Volume to Obviate Lung Injury) and ExPress (Expiratory Pressure) trials. We included subjects with available pre- and postintervention PaO2/FIO2 and ΔP (372 in ALVEOLI and 596 in ExPress). In each separate trial cohort, we performed multivariable Cox regression testing the association between ΔPaO2/FIO2 and ΔΔP with mortality. Results: In ALVEOLI, when analyzed as separate variables, DPaO2/ FIO2 was associated with mortality only in subjects in whom PEEP increased, whereas ΔΔP was associated with mortality irrespective of direction of PEEP change. When modeled together, improved ΔPaO2/ FIO2 was not associated with mortality, whereas ΔΔP remained associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.50 per 5 cm H2O increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.21–1.85). When modeled together in ExPress, ΔΔP (aHR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14–1.78) was more strongly associated with mortality than ΔPaO2/FIO2 (aHR, 0.95 per 25 mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 0.90–1.00). Conclusions: Reduced DP following protocolized ventilator changes was more strongly and consistently associated with lower mortality than was increased PaO2/FIO2, making ΔΔP more informative about benefit from ventilator adjustments. Our results reinforce the primacy of ΔP, rather than oxygenation, as the key variable associated with outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)857-864
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • Driving pressure
  • Oxygenation
  • Pa/FI
  • PEEP
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure

Cite this