Response to comments from Shi and Atrens on the paper "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium"

N. T. Kirkland; G. Williams; N. Birbilis

doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022

Response to comments from Shi and Atrens on the paper "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium"

N. T. Kirkland, G. Williams, N. Birbilis

Materials Science & Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A consolidated response is made here to address the comments of Shi and Atrens concerning the manuscript "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium". We provide discussion to indicate that the claims made by Shi and Atrens are invalid from an electrochemical and logical perspective, and therefore there is no basis for Shi and Atrens claim that our work provides evidence for Mg⁺.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	407-409
Number of pages	3
Journal	Corrosion Science
Volume	77
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022
Publication status	Published - Dec 2013

Keywords

Magnesium
Galvanostatic
Anodic dissolution

Access to Document

10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022

Link to publication in Scopus

5 Citations
1 Letter

Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium
Kirkland, N. T., Williams, G. & Birbilis, N., Dec 2012, In: Corrosion Science. 65, p. 5-9 5 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Cite this

@article{ef60c862fa974a26b605c1cd06831382,

title = "Response to comments from Shi and Atrens on the paper {"}Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium{"}",

abstract = "A consolidated response is made here to address the comments of Shi and Atrens concerning the manuscript {"}Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium{"}. We provide discussion to indicate that the claims made by Shi and Atrens are invalid from an electrochemical and logical perspective, and therefore there is no basis for Shi and Atrens claim that our work provides evidence for Mg+.",

keywords = "Magnesium, Galvanostatic, Anodic dissolution",

author = "Kirkland, {N. T.} and G. Williams and N. Birbilis",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022",

language = "English",

volume = "77",

pages = "407--409",

journal = "Corrosion Science",

issn = "0010-938X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comments from Shi and Atrens on the paper "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium"

AU - Kirkland, N. T.

AU - Williams, G.

AU - Birbilis, N.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - A consolidated response is made here to address the comments of Shi and Atrens concerning the manuscript "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium". We provide discussion to indicate that the claims made by Shi and Atrens are invalid from an electrochemical and logical perspective, and therefore there is no basis for Shi and Atrens claim that our work provides evidence for Mg+.

AB - A consolidated response is made here to address the comments of Shi and Atrens concerning the manuscript "Observations of the galvanostatic dissolution of pure magnesium". We provide discussion to indicate that the claims made by Shi and Atrens are invalid from an electrochemical and logical perspective, and therefore there is no basis for Shi and Atrens claim that our work provides evidence for Mg+.

KW - Magnesium

KW - Galvanostatic

KW - Anodic dissolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885171384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022

DO - 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.022

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:84885171384

VL - 77

SP - 407

EP - 409

JO - Corrosion Science

JF - Corrosion Science

SN - 0010-938X

ER -