Projects per year
Abstract
This paper discusses two types of response-scale heterogeneity, which may impact upon the EQ-5D. Response-scale heterogeneity in reporting occurs when individuals systematically differ in their use of response scales when responding to self-assessments. This type of heterogeneity is widely observed in relation to other self-assessed measures but is often overlooked with regard to the EQ-5D. Analogous to this, preference elicitation involving the EQ-5D could be subject to a similar type of heterogeneity, where variations across respondents may occur in the interpretations of the levels (response categories) being valued. This response-scale heterogeneity in preference elicitation may differ from variations in preferences for health states, which have been observed in the literature. This paper explores what these forms of response-scale heterogeneity may mean for the EQ-5D and the potential implications for researchers who rely on the instrument as a measure of health and quality of life. We identify situations where they are likely to be problematic and present potential avenues for overcoming these issues.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 387-394 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Health Economics |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- anchoring vignettes
- differential item functioning
- EQ-5D
- multi-attribute utility instruments
- preference heterogeneity
- reporting heterogeneity
- response-scale heterogeneity
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Mis-Reporting, Adaptation and Anchoring: The implications for Self Assessed Health
Lorgelly, P., Harris, M. N., Hollingsworth, B., Greene, W., Rice, N. & Wildman, J.
Australian Research Council (ARC), Monash University, Curtin University
4/01/11 → 31/12/14
Project: Research