RESPOND

A programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for an economic evaluation

R T Morello, R. L. Morris, K. D. Hill, T. P. Haines, G. Arendts, J. Redfern, C. D. Etherton-Beer, J. A. Lowthian, C. A. Brand, D. Liew, J. J. Watts, A. L. Barker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Falls remain common for community dwelling older people and impose a substantial economic burden to the healthcare system. RESPOND is a novel falls prevention programme that aims to reduce secondary falls and fall injuries among older people who present to a hospital emergency department (ED) with a fall. The present protocol describes a prospective economic evaluation examining the incremental cost effectiveness of the RESPOND programme, compared with usual care practice, from the Australian health system perspective. Methods and design: This economic evaluation will recruit 528 participants from two major tertiary hospital EDs in Australia and will be undertaken alongside a multisite randomised controlled trial. Outcome and costing data will be collected for all participants over the 12-month trial. It will compare the RESPOND falls prevention programme with usual care practice (current community-based falls prevention practices) to determine its incremental cost-effectiveness according to three intermediate clinical outcomes: (1) falls prevented, (2) fall injuries prevented and (3) injurious falls prevented. In addition, utilities will be derived from a generic qualityof- life measure (EQ-5D-5L) and used to calculate the 'incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained'. Discussion: The results of this study will provide healthcare decision makers with evidence to assist with setting spending thresholds for preventive health programmes and inform selection of emergency and community service models of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-130
Number of pages7
JournalInjury Prevention
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Cite this

@article{d6fc16a31fd2469c8b5dcb52228c1e45,
title = "RESPOND: A programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for an economic evaluation",
abstract = "Background: Falls remain common for community dwelling older people and impose a substantial economic burden to the healthcare system. RESPOND is a novel falls prevention programme that aims to reduce secondary falls and fall injuries among older people who present to a hospital emergency department (ED) with a fall. The present protocol describes a prospective economic evaluation examining the incremental cost effectiveness of the RESPOND programme, compared with usual care practice, from the Australian health system perspective. Methods and design: This economic evaluation will recruit 528 participants from two major tertiary hospital EDs in Australia and will be undertaken alongside a multisite randomised controlled trial. Outcome and costing data will be collected for all participants over the 12-month trial. It will compare the RESPOND falls prevention programme with usual care practice (current community-based falls prevention practices) to determine its incremental cost-effectiveness according to three intermediate clinical outcomes: (1) falls prevented, (2) fall injuries prevented and (3) injurious falls prevented. In addition, utilities will be derived from a generic qualityof- life measure (EQ-5D-5L) and used to calculate the 'incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained'. Discussion: The results of this study will provide healthcare decision makers with evidence to assist with setting spending thresholds for preventive health programmes and inform selection of emergency and community service models of care.",
author = "Morello, {R T} and Morris, {R. L.} and Hill, {K. D.} and Haines, {T. P.} and G. Arendts and J. Redfern and Etherton-Beer, {C. D.} and Lowthian, {J. A.} and Brand, {C. A.} and D. Liew and Watts, {J. J.} and Barker, {A. L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042169",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "124--130",
journal = "Injury Prevention",
issn = "1353-8047",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RESPOND : A programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for an economic evaluation. / Morello, R T; Morris, R. L.; Hill, K. D.; Haines, T. P.; Arendts, G.; Redfern, J.; Etherton-Beer, C. D.; Lowthian, J. A.; Brand, C. A.; Liew, D.; Watts, J. J.; Barker, A. L.

In: Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 124-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - RESPOND

T2 - A programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for an economic evaluation

AU - Morello, R T

AU - Morris, R. L.

AU - Hill, K. D.

AU - Haines, T. P.

AU - Arendts, G.

AU - Redfern, J.

AU - Etherton-Beer, C. D.

AU - Lowthian, J. A.

AU - Brand, C. A.

AU - Liew, D.

AU - Watts, J. J.

AU - Barker, A. L.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background: Falls remain common for community dwelling older people and impose a substantial economic burden to the healthcare system. RESPOND is a novel falls prevention programme that aims to reduce secondary falls and fall injuries among older people who present to a hospital emergency department (ED) with a fall. The present protocol describes a prospective economic evaluation examining the incremental cost effectiveness of the RESPOND programme, compared with usual care practice, from the Australian health system perspective. Methods and design: This economic evaluation will recruit 528 participants from two major tertiary hospital EDs in Australia and will be undertaken alongside a multisite randomised controlled trial. Outcome and costing data will be collected for all participants over the 12-month trial. It will compare the RESPOND falls prevention programme with usual care practice (current community-based falls prevention practices) to determine its incremental cost-effectiveness according to three intermediate clinical outcomes: (1) falls prevented, (2) fall injuries prevented and (3) injurious falls prevented. In addition, utilities will be derived from a generic qualityof- life measure (EQ-5D-5L) and used to calculate the 'incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained'. Discussion: The results of this study will provide healthcare decision makers with evidence to assist with setting spending thresholds for preventive health programmes and inform selection of emergency and community service models of care.

AB - Background: Falls remain common for community dwelling older people and impose a substantial economic burden to the healthcare system. RESPOND is a novel falls prevention programme that aims to reduce secondary falls and fall injuries among older people who present to a hospital emergency department (ED) with a fall. The present protocol describes a prospective economic evaluation examining the incremental cost effectiveness of the RESPOND programme, compared with usual care practice, from the Australian health system perspective. Methods and design: This economic evaluation will recruit 528 participants from two major tertiary hospital EDs in Australia and will be undertaken alongside a multisite randomised controlled trial. Outcome and costing data will be collected for all participants over the 12-month trial. It will compare the RESPOND falls prevention programme with usual care practice (current community-based falls prevention practices) to determine its incremental cost-effectiveness according to three intermediate clinical outcomes: (1) falls prevented, (2) fall injuries prevented and (3) injurious falls prevented. In addition, utilities will be derived from a generic qualityof- life measure (EQ-5D-5L) and used to calculate the 'incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained'. Discussion: The results of this study will provide healthcare decision makers with evidence to assist with setting spending thresholds for preventive health programmes and inform selection of emergency and community service models of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994609021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042169

DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042169

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 124

EP - 130

JO - Injury Prevention

JF - Injury Prevention

SN - 1353-8047

IS - 2

ER -