Resources for a journey of hope

Raymond Williams on utopia and science fiction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Raymond Williams had an enduring interest in science fiction, an interest attested to: first, by two articles specifically addressed to the genre, both of which were eventually published in the journal Science Fiction Studies; second, by a wide range of reference in more familiar texts, such as Culture and Society, The Long Revolution, George Orwell and The Country and the City; and third, by his two ‘future novels’, The Volunteers and The Fight for Manod, the first clearly science-fictional in character, the latter less so. This article will summarise this work, and will also explore how some of Williams’s more general key theoretical concepts – especially structure of feeling and selective tradition – can be applied to the genre. Finally, it will argue that the ‘sociological’ turn, by which Williams sought to substitute description and explanation for judgement and canonisation as the central purposes of analysis, represents a more productive approach to science fiction studies than the kind of prescriptive criticism deployed by other avowedly ‘neo-Marxist’ works, such as Darko Suvin’s Metamorphoses of Science Fiction and Fredric Jameson’s Archaeologies of the Future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-430
Number of pages16
JournalCultural Sociology
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Raymond Williams
  • science fiction
  • science fiction studies
  • utopia
  • utopian
  • dystopia
  • dystopian
  • cultural materialism
  • literature
  • sociology
  • sociology of literature

Cite this

@article{589241e3f8e24df99bc644b14fee477a,
title = "Resources for a journey of hope: Raymond Williams on utopia and science fiction",
abstract = "Raymond Williams had an enduring interest in science fiction, an interest attested to: first, by two articles specifically addressed to the genre, both of which were eventually published in the journal Science Fiction Studies; second, by a wide range of reference in more familiar texts, such as Culture and Society, The Long Revolution, George Orwell and The Country and the City; and third, by his two ‘future novels’, The Volunteers and The Fight for Manod, the first clearly science-fictional in character, the latter less so. This article will summarise this work, and will also explore how some of Williams’s more general key theoretical concepts – especially structure of feeling and selective tradition – can be applied to the genre. Finally, it will argue that the ‘sociological’ turn, by which Williams sought to substitute description and explanation for judgement and canonisation as the central purposes of analysis, represents a more productive approach to science fiction studies than the kind of prescriptive criticism deployed by other avowedly ‘neo-Marxist’ works, such as Darko Suvin’s Metamorphoses of Science Fiction and Fredric Jameson’s Archaeologies of the Future.",
keywords = "Raymond Williams, science fiction, science fiction studies, utopia, utopian, dystopia, dystopian, cultural materialism, literature, sociology, sociology of literature",
author = "Andrew Milner",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1749975516631584",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "415--430",
journal = "Cultural Sociology",
issn = "1749-9755",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Resources for a journey of hope : Raymond Williams on utopia and science fiction. / Milner, Andrew .

In: Cultural Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2016, p. 415-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resources for a journey of hope

T2 - Raymond Williams on utopia and science fiction

AU - Milner, Andrew

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Raymond Williams had an enduring interest in science fiction, an interest attested to: first, by two articles specifically addressed to the genre, both of which were eventually published in the journal Science Fiction Studies; second, by a wide range of reference in more familiar texts, such as Culture and Society, The Long Revolution, George Orwell and The Country and the City; and third, by his two ‘future novels’, The Volunteers and The Fight for Manod, the first clearly science-fictional in character, the latter less so. This article will summarise this work, and will also explore how some of Williams’s more general key theoretical concepts – especially structure of feeling and selective tradition – can be applied to the genre. Finally, it will argue that the ‘sociological’ turn, by which Williams sought to substitute description and explanation for judgement and canonisation as the central purposes of analysis, represents a more productive approach to science fiction studies than the kind of prescriptive criticism deployed by other avowedly ‘neo-Marxist’ works, such as Darko Suvin’s Metamorphoses of Science Fiction and Fredric Jameson’s Archaeologies of the Future.

AB - Raymond Williams had an enduring interest in science fiction, an interest attested to: first, by two articles specifically addressed to the genre, both of which were eventually published in the journal Science Fiction Studies; second, by a wide range of reference in more familiar texts, such as Culture and Society, The Long Revolution, George Orwell and The Country and the City; and third, by his two ‘future novels’, The Volunteers and The Fight for Manod, the first clearly science-fictional in character, the latter less so. This article will summarise this work, and will also explore how some of Williams’s more general key theoretical concepts – especially structure of feeling and selective tradition – can be applied to the genre. Finally, it will argue that the ‘sociological’ turn, by which Williams sought to substitute description and explanation for judgement and canonisation as the central purposes of analysis, represents a more productive approach to science fiction studies than the kind of prescriptive criticism deployed by other avowedly ‘neo-Marxist’ works, such as Darko Suvin’s Metamorphoses of Science Fiction and Fredric Jameson’s Archaeologies of the Future.

KW - Raymond Williams

KW - science fiction

KW - science fiction studies

KW - utopia

KW - utopian

KW - dystopia

KW - dystopian

KW - cultural materialism

KW - literature

KW - sociology

KW - sociology of literature

U2 - 10.1177/1749975516631584

DO - 10.1177/1749975516631584

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 415

EP - 430

JO - Cultural Sociology

JF - Cultural Sociology

SN - 1749-9755

IS - 4

ER -